SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: s martin who wrote (23479)12/3/1997 9:23:00 PM
From: joseph krinsky  Respond to of 55532
 
S martin tell us something abouy you, only if you wish, joey



To: s martin who wrote (23479)12/3/1997 10:13:00 PM
From: TopCat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
 
<<Allen These threads are available to post on whether a person owns a stock or not. There are two points of view being posted on almost every stock on SI. If you only wish to hear one side, then skip the posts you don't want to see and you can remain convinced of your wisdom.>>

s martin,

Well said. What these people are upset about is that they know that their hype, without any counter opinions, would have caused this stock to soar. But, as you point out, that is the case with just about any stock. If every positive news release were taken at face value and not questioned....if no contrary view were presented, any stock would soar.

The problem is that if this stock were truely in a short squeeze, all the naysaying would not have kept the stock down. The only reason this stock has maintained the value that it has is that the "true believers" keep buying.

I find it interesting that when Riley first started posting he talked about fundamentals.....then fundamentals didn't mean anything because it was a short squeeze....now, do you notice that Riley is talking about fundamentals again (the whole issue of Water, the label, etc. is about fundamentals). Which is it?

Ain't this fun?

TC



To: s martin who wrote (23479)12/3/1997 10:27:00 PM
From: Just My Opinion  Respond to of 55532
 
s martin: I am sorry.
Your post, to me, had absolutely no connection to what I was saying.
Unfortunately, I believe you know that.
Your last line was a beau..ty..

What is that old saying?...

"The Last Refuge of a Scoundral, is Patriotism"??

:-))) al



To: s martin who wrote (23479)12/3/1997 11:00:00 PM
From: Steve Borgdine  Respond to of 55532
 
O C'mon, SM. Don't take the high moral road with us. You lost your shot at that a long time ago. Noone takes you serious and to attempt this "there are two points of view" routine is pathetic. You are not involved with this project in order to present another "point of view". It has been obvious for a long time now why you are here. But hang around if you want. Just know that you are very transparent.
Steve B.