Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : CFZ E-Wiggle Workspace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: POKERSAM who wrote (15015)	2/22/2013 7:01:59 PM
From: skinowski	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41536

I don't really understand the confusion. We dropped in five waves off the top and now we have retraced 50% in 3 waves. Five down and three up make a complete EW cycle. Next is five more down. What other EW pattern would contain 5 down 3 up without 5 more down? Agree - that's why I decided to step aside. But, as the theory goes, EWaves reflect the dynamics of the public mood, of the collective unconscious. And moods are fickle. Following them is like following a drunken sailor, hoping that he will lead you to the port where his ship is docked. Most of the time he will actually make it back to the home ship, but sometimes he'll get lost and may get into trouble.... :) This is especially true about wiggles. A two day impulse is not a trend changer. But it is an indicator. Or an indication. We'll find out if it worked.

To: POKERSAM who wrote (15015)	2/23/2013 7:30:13 AM
From: kckip	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41536

that's the expectation here of course too....not sure who/what you're responding to......... Just exploring possibilities...5 up and 3 down is certainly a simple enough concept :) tell us, are we in a ((iv:iii:3), (iv:3) , or 4 ......or even 2 or b? that's the part that would be helpful if you can set it straight, or is it possible that the correction was actually an abc and is over? DJI retraced +> 68.1% and overlapped the probable (1) down....c would be slightly > 2.62 x a, is the correction over or still a (b)?...........is it counting differently? just exploring possibilities here, everyone is sharing his/her own thoughts.15, 30, 60 min, but then, it's a EW//TA wiggle thread. Because of the overlap, I favor a 2 or b here, but the SPX still says could be 4.....we should know Monday.....or not..... respectfully, sorry Ski