Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Ox who wrote (13885)	3/14/2013 11:01:36 PM
From: Yorikke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33421

Absolutely. Children as the beneficiaries of munificent tax breaks for child rearing and education will be held responsible for their family debt. ....Its over the top?......How over the top is what we see today? Look at the negative image, What will stop them from building in implied debt assumption/responsibility into loans, educational agreements, property deeds, any other hundreds of small print methods of theft and coercion? (You want to borrow money from the syndicate then sign this agreement that you are responsible for the past, or you get nothing and go nowhere in the future.) One other point, members of the sleaze generation, the baby-boomers, will support any rule that will shift the burden onto those under 60. They'll party hearty right into the grave, paying off the political panderers with money they don't really have. And there seems to be nothing the younger generations can do about it. ....except perhaps whore out the best looking women to old geezers with all the gelt. It's already here...college students having 'friendships' with older individuals who help 'support' them in while they are in college. LOL....