Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (705264)	3/21/2013 9:14:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1575426

Brumar, Bush did keep Clarke on. The thing about Richard Clarke was that he was caught up in the systematic failures within the CIA that missed the big clues leading to 9/11. Those failures happened on both Bush and Clinton's watch. I don't think anything would have turned out different had Gore been elected, contrary to what gullible_libtard seems to believe. That's because there was no indication that Gore would have gone in and cleaned up the CIA bureaucracy in time to prevent 9/11. Very few people would have had the foresight to even propose it, much less possess the leadership and the brass balls to go through with it. Tenchusatsu