SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (706011)3/27/2013 1:43:31 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578426
 
No its the Bay Area. Check the link.

San Francisco and Oakland together only have about 1.2 million
.

Tim, now you are excluding their suburbs? Why?

this larger CSA contains 7.46 million people—the sixth-largest CSA in the U.S.

1- The CSA goes beyond the bay area. It goes as far as something like 100 miles South of San Jose.


I don't care how far south is goes.............the CSA is what businesses predicate their business decisions on and how cities market themselves.

And just for the record, hi speed rail will travel thru those 100 miles to get to LA.

2 - Even if you use the CSA's population instead it changes almost nothing. It gets you only an extra 310k people.

More than enough to fill seats on hi speed rail. More than enough.

3- The CSA for Los Angeles goes all the way to the borders with Nevada and Arizona. Its a bit of a stretch to call that metro LA.

Why is this important? Hi speed rail will probably go all the way to San Diego. Another hi speed rail line is planned between Vegas and LA and they working to have the two lines meet up in one of the LA exurbs.


4 - Even if you do (and you use the San Francisco CSA as well). And you moved the Chicago-Naperville-Michigan_City_CSA, to southern California (without moving any of the existing people out), greater Tokyo and Osaka would still have something like 3 million more people.

Like I said, maybe they won't be able to schedule as many trains on the LA/SF route as they do with the Tokyo/Osaka route. So what?

6 - An in addition to the much greater density, again you have much more expensive fuel, and other factors acting against driving the trip in Japan. Basically that line covers the number one region in the world for high speed rail traffic. It fits there not just better but much better than anywhere else.

Hi speed rail is successful all around the world. Only Rs think otherwise.

The traffic between SF and LA is horrendous.

You think traffic in Tokyo and Osaka and Nagoya is a piece of cake? Also the Japanese drive is almost 70 miles longer.


Straw man. It doesn't matter what the traffic is between Tokyo and Osaka. We are talking SF to LA......and the traffic between those two cities is horrendous.



To: TimF who wrote (706011)3/28/2013 11:54:57 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1578426
 
Massachusetts Plan Starts Small for Big Upgrade to Rail System


Evan McGlinn for The New York Times
Gov. Deval Patrick has envisioned a $13 billion overhaul of the state transportation system. The Downeaster runs between Boston and Portland, Me., in a partnership with Amtrak. More Photos »

By KATHARINE Q. SEELYEPublished: March 25, 2013 BOSTON — Later this spring, Bostonians eager to flee to Cape Cod for the weekend will have an option other than sitting in bumper-to-bumper traffic for 70 miles and fuming along with everyone else.

Starting May 24, they can hop a train to Hyannis, where regional buses, ferries and rental cars will await to whisk them out to the beaches, islands and wind-swept dunes.

The train, the first passenger service to the cape since 1995, is one small piece of a major $13 billion transportation overhaul envisioned by Gov. Deval Patrick. That overhaul is aimed chiefly at repairing and upgrading worn-out bridges, roads and commuter lines in Massachusetts, but about 20 percent of it would go toward reviving train service to the cape and elsewhere in the state.

Mr. Patrick said that upgrading these in-state routes would spur economic development. It would also provide important links for Amtrak’s long-range plans to establish high-speed train service throughout New England.

The package is the most sweeping and future-oriented of Mr. Patrick’s tenure. But it faces some high hurdles. It would require a major tax increase. And it faces a skeptical public still recovering from what people here call the Big Dig hangover — the multibillion-dollar debt from the nation’s most expensive highway project.

Mr. Patrick, a Democrat, had nothing to do with the Big Dig but the project deferred investments that he says should have been made in aging infrastructure and increased repair costs that are necessary now.

“The plan is ambitious,” said Stephanie Pollack, a transportation specialist at the Dukakis Center for Urban and Regional Policy at Northeastern University. “And it’s depressing that this is considered ambitious when most of the money is going to fixing what we have now.”

But, she said, “this is probably the first time in decades that Massachusetts has stepped back and said, ‘Here’s what we need to do for the next quarter century.’ ”

In addition to service to the cape, Mr. Patrick has proposed reviving service from Boston to Fall River and New Bedford as well as from the Berkshires to the Connecticut border to enable future service to New York City. He has proposed extending service to Medford. He has also called for an $850 million expansion of the number of tracks at Boston’s South Station to accommodate more commuter lines and longer-distance Amtrak trains. The station now is a major bottleneck that causes serious delays.

Amtrak’s plans for high-speed rail include service from Portland, Me., to New York City along an inland route through Springfield, Mass., and one between Boston and New York that would cut travel time to 90 minutes from the current three hours and 40 minutes.

To pay for his transportation package, as well as some new education programs, Mr. Patrick has proposed $1.9 billion in new taxes, one of the biggest levies Massachusetts has seen in a generation. He would raise the state income tax to 6.25 percent from 5.25 percent and lower the state sales tax to 4.5 percent from 6.25 percent. Residents who make more than $102,000 a year would shoulder most of the burden.

Mr. Patrick, who is not seeking re-election in 2014, is spending much of his political capital trying to convince both citizens and legislators that “high-impact” transportation projects can pay for themselves.

For example, the governor’s administration says, the South Coast rail line to Fall River and New Bedford would cost $1.8 billion, but it would create 3,800 jobs and generate $500 million a year in economic growth.

“The public will pay more if they see their sacrifice is actually going to net them a specific good,” said Richard A. Davey, the state’s transportation secretary, who is conducting an aggressive campaign to help sell the governor’s package. It includes a Web site that allows residents to see exactly what the spending would mean in their localities.

But the tax proposal has drawn ridicule from Republicans and a cool reception from the legislature, which is overwhelmingly Democratic. The speaker of the House, Robert A. DeLeo, wants to downsize the governor’s wish list, which is leading to intense negotiations over which parts of the package might be cut. At the same time, Mayor Will Flanagan of Fall River, for example, says he will hold the governor to his promise to veto the entire package if South Coast rail is dropped.

The proposal comes as passenger trains, particularly on routes under 400 miles, are rebounding across much of the country and proving a boon to economic development.

“American passenger rail is in the midst of a renaissance,” said a new report from the Brookings Institution, which attributed the increase in part to partnerships between Amtrak and the federal and state governments.

  • 1
  • Next Page
  • 2

  • link