SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (706449)3/29/2013 11:38:09 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577836
 
So is this how Rs want to spend our money.........on frigging war ships that costing $37 billion when we have enough warships already to circle the globe or on voter id when voter fraud barely exists? You all prefer this crap than the health of Americans? Brilliant!

Whoops, Turns Out the Navy’s $37 Billion Boat Is a Death Trap

Hamilton Nolan

After 9/11, the US Navy launched a massive program to build a "Littoral Combat Ship" that could fight submarines, clear underwater mines, and perform other tasks close to shore, because, um... you never know where the terrorists might be, with snorkels. Astoundingly, it appears more and more like this boondoggle has become—you guessed it—a boondoggle.

A decade into this... important national safety water boat program, we can reflect that everything has not gone smoothly. "The ship has been beset by troubles, including cracks and corrosion, its price has doubled since 2005 to $440 million per vessel," Bloomberg reports. But minor problems like those can be fixed by the usual US military method of papering over the cracks with hundred-dollar bills, then sealing them all together with a glue made of melted Yemeni civilians. What's harder to accept are these new reports that the Littoral Combat Ships, which have cost the American taxpayer $37 billion, are basically f loating death traps:

Nothing has haunted the LCS more than the perception that both variants are too lightly armed and may not survive an enemy attack. The Pentagon's chief weapons tester has cited flaws with the ship's guns and concluded that its helicopter isn't powerful enough to tow mine-hunting equipment.

The ship "is not expected to be survivable in that it is not expected to maintain mission capability after taking a significant hit in a hostile combat environment," Michael Gilmore, the weapons tester, said in a January report.

Haha, the United States Navy has spent $37 billion building a military boat and it turns out it doesn't have enough guns. Well, shit. I mean, it's a boat. Who would anticipate someone shooting at it? That's crazy.

Rufus, you got any shotguns back there these fellas can take out on a boat?

link



To: i-node who wrote (706449)3/29/2013 4:53:50 PM
From: Alighieri1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577836
 
It may not be a "plan" but it is at least a direction that can begin to undo the damage of having government take over our health care system.

That's non sense...even Obama care is through private insurance. Stop exaggerating please?

Ben Carson has proposed something that totally makes sense -- and would at least be a step in the right direction.

Really? What did he propose?

Al