SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Burry who wrote (2653)12/5/1997 3:41:00 AM
From: Stewart Whitman  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 78579
 
But, is there anything that says the DD industry will cycle back in some reasonable fashion?

It used to be that a typical home user would need more disk than came with a machine. Now with a fast CD-ROM and 2GB+ being the standard "shipped" configuration, the home user is rarely going to run out and buy a new disk drive at any time some. No need for me to put everything on my disk - large data files stay on the CD-ROM, or I better still, I pull info off the net.

So then, you have the corporate users who are still buying high-end drives (e.g. 2 Gb+, SCSI). This is the area where QNTM and SEG compete and WDC doesn't. In my opinion, there is inevitably going to be a shift to thin clients in the corporate arena. Networks are getting faster, and maintenence costs of traditional clients are too expensive. That definitely cuts a lot of disk drives out. Sure I have my 200GB server - say 20 disks in an array - but I've eliminated say 300 disk drives on everyone's workstation (storing the same 300 copies of Windows!). Let's see - where I would've bought 300 drives, I now need only 20. How will that affect profit-margins and competition? The same argument goes for tape drives.

Granted, these changes will occur slowly, but I think that the long-term outlook for this industry is really poor. These businesses are not really "cheap" for a low-margin, shrinking, commodity businesses - they have just come down from a point of being over-valued. All these stocks are still thought of as "technology" stocks. But, none of the companies actually has too much in the way of a defensible technology position with which other's cannot compete. I believe at some point that the industry will stablize, but I can't predict who will come out on top, what the margins will be, and what a reasonable industry P/E will be.

Stew