Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Craig Stevenson who wrote (12942)	12/5/1997 9:56:00 AM
From: KJ. Moy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29386

Craig, <<<I don't know what the answer is, but I'm tempted to be a little less free with information here. Let the shorts and nay-sayers sweat it out for a change. Those of us that are long-time ANCR holders, know the situation, both the good and the bad. We can still communicate in private about sensitive aspects, and use this format for more general, Ancor and Fibre Channel related topics. Just my take.>>> I totally agree. I also think many of us are quick to defend against false rumors about Ancor. In doing so, we may have inadvertently helped their competitors. KJ

To: Craig Stevenson who wrote (12942)	12/5/1997 11:51:00 AM
From: trendmastr	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 29386

Just my opinion and certainly no offense guys, but this all seems a little bit too paranoid for me. I hope we don't start seeing conspiracy theories soon - is Oliver Stone a shareholder?

To: Craig Stevenson who wrote (12942)	12/6/1997 4:25:00 AM
From: Eleleth	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29386

<<I'm tempted to be a little less free with information here. Let the shorts and nay-sayers sweat it out for a change. Those of us that are long-time ANCR holders, know the situation, both the good and the bad. We can still communicate in private about sensitive aspects, and use this format for more general, Ancor and Fibre Channel related topics. Just my take.>> Craig: When I came accross wildbull/wilhu/ar's post on the web Fool, that old ancr knot formed in my gut I had no place to turn to but this board. What a relief it was after waking up the next morning, with pulse still racing, to find a dozen posts setting the record straight. Had all those posts been restricted to a closed email loop, I (and many others) would have been left to sweat it out. I honestly don't think that ar's post was a subterfuge to wheedle information on ancor. Even if it was, he learned nothing from SI that a call to the company would not have confirmed. I can understand not wanting to reveal critical information on ancor's tech progress but nipping misinformation in the bud is one of the really great things about this thread. Here's to hoping that you keep it as open (and, yes, as clean) as it has always been. E