SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (712344)4/29/2013 2:48:10 PM
From: bentway2 Recommendations  Respond to of 1574826
 
You really don't think Z or any "liberal" APPROVES of the spending on the unneeded tanks, do you Ten? The vast majority of the stuff the military buys is totally unneeded, and the stuff they have already is all they need to protect us 10x over. But the plants that make them are in every state in the nation, not by accident.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (712344)4/29/2013 4:02:30 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1574826
 
Mom Forced Daughter, 14, to Impregnate Herself

SHE WANTED ANOTHER BABY, BUT WAS BARRED FROM ADOPTING

By Evann Gastaldo, Newser Staff
newser.com
Posted Apr 29, 2013 1:30 PM CDT

(NEWSER) – A mother who was barred from adopting more children found a criminal way to increase her brood: She forced her 14-year-old daughter to start inseminating herself with donor sperm the mother bought on the Internet. The girl, a virgin, is thought to have miscarried at 14, and ended up giving birth at age 16 after inseminating herself seven times, the Guardian reports. The disturbing details are included in a recently opened court judgment; the mother is serving five years in prison.

The unnamed mother did not want to give birth due to a health problem, so she adopted her three children from abroad when they were infants, two of them while married and one after she divorced. She was attempting to adopt a fourth child when she was denied and came up with the plot involving her daughter. Midwives who delivered the baby became suspicious when the mother tried to keep her daughter from breastfeeding the new baby, and called in child protection workers when the mother tried to take the baby away from her daughter.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (712344)4/30/2013 1:31:42 AM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574826
 
>Here you go, SilentZ. This is what "good deficit spending" vs. "bad deficit spending" leads to:

That's bad deficit spending. It's also bad surplus spending. What's your point?

-Z