SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DallasKevin who wrote (42466)4/29/2013 8:44:42 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Many of them weren't populated.

From Wikipedia:

San Francisco CA: In 1835, Englishman William Richardson erected the first independent homestead, [21] near a boat anchorage around what is today Portsmouth Square. Together with Alcalde Francisco de Haro, he laid out a street plan for the expanded settlement, and the town, named Yerba Buena, began to attract American settlers.

Los Angeles - Well there was a town there: The settlement remained a small ranch town for decades, but by 1820 the population had increased to about 650 residents.

San Jacinto: If you're talking about TX, there wasn't any town or city there back in Mexican times and there still isn't.

Gonzales - You'd think this would be a pre-existing Mexican town, but: Gonzales is one of the earliest Anglo-American settlements in Texas, the first west of the Colorado River. It was established by Empresario Green DeWitt as the capital of his colony in August 1825. DeWitt named the community for Rafael Gonzáles, governor of Coahuila y Tejas. [5] Informally, the community was known as the Dewitt Colony.

How about Corpus Christi? Corpus Christi was founded in 1839 by Colonel Henry Lawrence Kinney as Kinney's Trading Post, or Kinney's Ranch. It was a small trading post to sell supplies to a Mexican revolutionary army camped about 25 miles (40 km) west.

Goliad, Nacogdoches, and San Antonio were Mexican towns in early TX. There may have been a few more.

I think many more of the place names in California date back to towns .... usually missions with very small populations. You can't just assume though that someplace with a Spanish name was Mexican territory populated by loads of Mexicans prior to the Mexican war. Consider Montana, Colorado, Nevada which had zero Mexican settlements. The Mexican population in its northern territories was very sparse even in the areas where settlements existed like CA, NM, and TX.



To: DallasKevin who wrote (42466)4/29/2013 9:29:44 PM
From: longnshort3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
"Those all have Spanish names because they were founded by the Spanish and Mexico"

WTF those towns were founded by spanish priest 300 years before mexico was formed. where do you libs get your history ?

come on man read a freaking history book



To: DallasKevin who wrote (42466)4/30/2013 2:49:07 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
for the edification of the board

Mexican Cession
en.wikipedia.org
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
en.wikipedia.org
Gadsen Purchase
en.wikipedia.org

Quick question: Isn't Mexico guilty of the same sins against the american indians as the Anglo-Euros? (I know the answer to this question.....)