SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (713124)5/4/2013 12:26:20 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1583348
 
Ted, I'd argue that the sequester is actually helping the U.S. economy because it is shoring up confidence in this nation's fiscal future.

Maybe.......but I doubt it. Any confidence building would be minimal while the the cutbacks are significant and substantive. We won't know the full extent of the sequester til the end of this year and then it may be too late to do anything about it. Once again, Rs are playing Russian roulette with the American economy much like their European winger counterparts did with their economy..........and we saw how that turned out.

We have proven that spending cuts can be made, and growth in government can be limited, without the union coming apart at the seams.


At the cost of a great number of people and their jobs. You can't have it both ways.......complaining about job growth being weak and then claiming its a good thing when it suits your purposes.

That to me is more optimistic than acting like the world rests on Obama's shoulders, LOL ...

Yes, because your job was never threatened. You've remained at the top of the food chain all during the Great Recession so you have the luxury of feeling very good about the cutbacks in gov't spending. Many people do not.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (713124)5/4/2013 2:18:47 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583348
 
Of course you would. After all, what is good for the wealthy is good for America. If the middle class suffers because of it, so what? They should respect their betters...

Nothing like being an elitist, is there Tenchu?



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (713124)5/4/2013 2:27:21 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583348
 
I'd argue that the sequester is actually helping the U.S. economy because it is shoring up confidence in this nation's fiscal future.

We have proven that spending cuts can be made, and growth in government can be limited, without the union coming apart at the seams.


Couldn't agree more. Even though the "cuts" were small, they were something. I saw a liberal friend post elsewhere the other day, "What a great president. Dow hits new high." Yeah.

Unfortunately, I don't think we'll see a follow up.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (713124)5/5/2013 11:18:55 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1583348
 
European Stagnation

By THE EDITORIAL BOARD

Published: May 4, 2013

Economic conditions in Europe, especially in troubled nations like Spain, Portugal and Italy, have deteriorated sharply in recent months. Worse, new data released last week provides no hope for a recovery soon. The unemployment rate in the 17 countries that use the euro hit a record of 12.1 percent in March, up from 11 percent a year earlier. In Spain and Greece, more than half of the labor force under 25 is looking for work.

The good news, if it can be called that, is that a barrage of negative economic data appears to have stirred European leaders and senior officials at the International Monetary Fund into finally acknowledging that the Continent’s austerity policies are imposing unnecessary pain and suffering on average Europeans while doing little to lower debts and deficits.

José Manuel Barroso, the president of the European Commission, recently declared that austerity “has reached its limits in many respects.” And David Lipton, the first deputy managing director of the I.M.F., recently called on Europe to adopt “ more growth-friendly” policies and encouraged the European Central Bank to use unconventional measures like bond purchases to increase credit and stimulate the economy. This awakening is fine as a start. But real change will come when European leaders start reversing damaging budget cuts and restructuring their fragile banks. That means changing the status quo, no easy task. For starters, countries that use the euro have committed to maintaining fiscal deficits no higher than 3 percent of their gross domestic product as part of a “fiscal compact” with one another. And despite the fact that France, Portugal and several others are already struggling to meet that cap, even after raising taxes and slashing spending, nations like Germany and Finland remain committed to austerity. This is not smart. Enforcing these limits in the middle of a deep recession will not lower labor costs, increase competitiveness and reduce debt. On the contrary, it will simply perpetuate the downward spiral that weaker countries are stuck in and foster widespread anger without providing any meaningful economic payoff.

Meanwhile, a promising effort to deal with troubled banks appears to have been sidetracked or at least slowed. In December, the European Union agreed to centralize the supervision of large banks under the European Central Bank by March 2014 as a first step toward a banking union. But Wolfgang Schäuble, the finance minister of Germany, recently suggested that E.U. members first renegotiate changes to the union’s treaties to clearly separate the monetary and supervisory functions of the central bank. Wrangling over technical amendments could easily delay the broader effort to put the whole financial system on sounder footing.

At a meeting later this month in Brussels, E.U. leaders plan to discuss ways to improve the currency union, but they do not anticipate changing basic policies. In fact, analysts expect no major action until after Germany’s national elections in September. The conditions of 26.5 million unemployed Europeans who need help right away should not depend on an election that may or may not change anything.