Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (713360)	5/5/2013 1:35:28 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 1578178

What you should be concerned about is not whether I fell for it but why people are so easily persuaded that she could say something as stupid as that. Utter nonsense. Its no surprise that you, as King of the Dumbfukks,would fall for it.....no one else of reasonable intelligence would....so your statement is yet another mark of your idiocy.

To: tejek who wrote (713360)	5/5/2013 1:42:21 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578178

What you should be concerned about is not whether I fell for it but why people are so easily persuaded that she could say something as stupid as that. I see what you mean. Similarly, it was totally believable that Bloomberg would have gone on an expletive filled rant when he found that someone was trying to limit his intake of unhealthy food. It was also totally believable when the dailycurrant suggested CNN ran a segment praising Jerry Sandusky. And who would question that Sean Penn would praise Chavez and call G. Washington a loser? And it is totally believable that Paul Krugman would apply his macroeconomic philosophies to his own finances.....and end up in personal bankruptcy (my personal favorite, BTW). What it shows, more than anything else, is the bias that we bring to the table when reading the news, not any reality about the subjects of the satire.