Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask Mohan about the Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Surfer who wrote (10342)	12/6/1997 12:12:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18056

Surfer, both could right and have been reading our posts here. The scenario (which I am trying to educate the market it should follow, but somehow, it is a bad student and does not liste) is a low around 6200 by late Feb early March with a retest (possibly minor breach) in June and then a nice 50% rise to 9000 by early or spring 1999. Maybe they do read Mohan's thread after all (VBG). Zeev

To: Surfer who wrote (10342)	12/6/1997 12:43:00 AM
From: Bonnie Bear	Respond to of 18056

at 1% per day rate of change in the index, anything is possible!

To: Surfer who wrote (10342)	12/6/1997 12:50:00 AM
From: Simon	Respond to of 18056

That's why you have 8 or 10 horses in a horse race. So you can have 8 or 10 different opinions. BB I must be on a roll. Up 30 % in 10 days in the market (s/s) but I just got a contract on my RE package (all or none). Got everything crossed including my eyes. (VVVVBBG)

To: Surfer who wrote (10342)	12/6/1997 1:43:00 PM
From: James R. Barrett	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18056

Why oh why are so many people still trying to time the market? When are they going to realize that no one can time the market? In Oct. of 1994 I was one of the gullible idiots who believed a number of "experts" who said the market was overvalued and would fall 10 to to 20% in the next 6 to 12 months. So like a lamb going to slaughter I exchanged ALL of my 401K stock funds to a money market fund. Well everybody knows what the market did in 1995. Having confidence in and believing the "expert's" cost me over $25,000. I was so smug in thinking I was going to jump back in with shopping bags full of cash after the market tanked and then laugh at everybody else for being so stupid. In Nov. of 1995 it finally hit me that the "experts" were the idiots and totally wrong in their predictions. I'm not saying you should be 100% in stocks when the market is way overvalued like it is today, but I think 50% stocks and 50% cash in this particular market is reasonable. If the market goes up you'll catch half of it, if it goes down you'll have a bundle of cash to buy good stocks at cheap prices. Just my opinion. Jim