SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (46507)6/21/2013 8:41:03 AM
From: greenspirit1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TimF

  Respond to of 85487
 
to have government employees making more than their counterparts in private enterprise. You end up with your best and brightest people working for the least productive sector. If someone wants the security of a government job they ought be paid less than someone who has to face the trials of having to be successful at what they do (in the private sector, where they will be fired for nonperformance).
Beautifully said! The private sector supports the public sector, the public sector would not exist with the private sector, yet liberals largely see the relationship upside down.



To: i-node who wrote (46507)6/21/2013 9:47:01 AM
From: sm1th1 Recommendation

Recommended By
i-node

  Respond to of 85487
 
First, tax revenue as a percent of GDP is meaningless. If you want a figure that actually represents the size and scope of government
by his "logic", if there were no taxes and govt borrowed 100% of spending then the size of govt would be zero.



To: i-node who wrote (46507)6/21/2013 9:52:46 AM
From: sm1th  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
You end up with your best and brightest people working for the least productive sector.

Apparently you have not had much contact with federal employees