SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (47289)6/30/2013 1:55:04 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
"Studies say for every dollar spend on head start society gets between $30 and $60 back in reduction in crime and increased productivity. I don't know where to find the study, but remember it well."

lololol you are so full of shit.....oops i mean your posts are so full of shit



To: koan who wrote (47289)6/30/2013 3:24:10 PM
From: sm1th2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
TimF

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 85487
 
What I do believe is that it is impossible for a society to spend more on education than it will get back.

Then how do you explain the statistics, provided by the Dept of Education, showing that since 1970, inflation adjusted per student spending K-12 has tripled with no improvement in results. In 1970, we got the same result for 1/3 the cost. Every single extra $ was apparently wasted.



To: koan who wrote (47289)6/30/2013 3:25:18 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TimF

  Respond to of 85487
 
ame BS when pelosi said we get back 2 bucks for every one buck on food stamps



To: koan who wrote (47289)7/1/2013 1:45:25 AM
From: i-node3 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Paul Smith
TimF

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
>> What I do believe is that it is impossible for a society to spend more on education than it will get back.

Coming from a proponent of education, that is one of the most ignorant statements I've ever seen. It is pretty obvious that it depends totally on HOW you spend the money.

We are spending 4x the amount (maybe 5) that we were in 1965 (inflation adjusted). Has the quality of education kept pace with those expenditures? Hell, no. Not even close.

If you blow the money on keeping unions happy it is not benefiting students. If you're having to build "rubber rooms", you're wasting it.

In 2004, we spent nearly 500 Million on "Safe & Drug Free Schools State Grants." How's that working out? We have more kids using drugs today than ever -- and not just marijuana, but serious alcohol, opiate, and benzodiezipine addictions.

Over the last 30 years we've increased expenditures for special ed more than 400%. Special ed teachers are still using techniques, in many if not most cases, that have failed for the entire 30 year period. And I see it routinely in my work; these kids are having to go outside the school system to get the tools they need. Generally because public schools are too consumed with bureaucratic nonsense to adopt new methods.

That was a really absurd post.