To: polarisnh who wrote (2584 ) 12/9/1997 9:36:00 PM From: Miles Rhyne Hoffman, CFA Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8358
R&D expenses: I saw that someone gave you the R&D expense level. What good is that??? What was the book you may have had to read in school that was about "Billy Pilgrim"? Billy could see all of time, back and forward. My calculus teacher used him as a example when trying to teach us "not to look at the single point... derive the curve" What relavence? CS R&D as a percentage of sales: 90=7.1%, 91=9.1%, 92=9.7%, 93=10.1%, 94=10.3%, 95=10.5%, 96=10.7%, 97=11%,ytd=11.9% Is this good? Not in my opinion... thanks for forcing me to look at it. It reinforces my sell thesis. CS has the feel of a company with excellent technology, at the expense of all else... sales, profits, continuity... DLJ, one of the biggest CS bulls on Wall Street, took it from their Recommended List to Neutral. The analyst believes he has been wrong thinking that CS could handle growth with its "direct distribution" model. A lot of tech firms have had great technology and failed: I have bought IBM's OS2 three times and it is great OS. It's true 32bit when MSFT-Windows is not truly 32bit (lots of 16bit still in). Nonetheless, I use Windows now because of the availability of application software. I "hate" Windows and I owned it when it was Windows 1.0 and 2.0 (back then it was OK and did what it needed to do: Did people realize all the HYPE when "Windows 3.0" was released... it was, after all, "3.0"). Anyway, I digress... DLJ believes CS need improved distribution. He also shoots down the "takeover" stories, even though he thinks Nortel should take over CS. Nortel is a CS partner, but the head of their unit that partners with CS just left 2 weeks ago. Nortel is known to be conservative and the DLJ analyst does not believe it will jump in under the circumstances. Lucent has a definative acquisition strategy and it presumably would not lead to a takeover of CS. Also, everyone I have read believes the DECnet acq. was BAD, especially since it had been for sale for a year, no takers. Back to the original thought: see the R&D going up, up, up. This is symptomatic of a tech company that has to run harder and harder just to stay in place. After the last 2-3 qtrs, it looks like CS, although putting out effort (R&D), is not even staying in place. It is falling behind! I wish I had more time, but I expect I will generate a few commments so I'll try to add more when people come back to me. Besides, I'm waiting on two Wall Street analysts to call me back. More info as I have it... I would appreciate "TECHie" feedback... I'm a numbers man: PS: The inventory to sales ratio looks horrible: It has been increasing steadily for two years. LASTLY: My most "pig-headed" portfolio manager is hesitant to sell and wants to find a reason to hold CS. This makes me believe it should be sold!