Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (727191)	7/17/2013 3:03:45 PM
From: Don Hurst	2 Recommendations Recommended By Fiscally Conservative J_F_Shepard Read Replies (7) \| Respond to of 1579897

Re: >>"b) It takes the wind out of the sails of those trying to portray Martin as an "innocent youth." "<< Martin was walking to his father's house in the community. He was wearing a hoodie and going home. What was he guilty of? Because of that he was followed by an armed vigilante who got out of the safety of a vehicle caused a fight and shot and killed the unarmed kid. As Tavis Smiley has said...where is the NRA statement? If Martin had been armed, he could have "stood his ground" shot and killed the armed vigilante and acquitted. .