SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (229384)8/14/2013 3:42:23 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 542251
 
" I much prefer a kinder, gentler world, but I also acknowledge that all the beauty I see in the ecosystem is the result of a very long history of pain. That is a much more interesting philosophical question than most the questions which philosophers occupy themselves with..."

I think philosophers who deal with utilitarianism often tackle this question, but those philosophers are also often hated :-)



To: neolib who wrote (229384)8/14/2013 6:41:36 PM
From: koan  Respond to of 542251
 
That post has a lot in it. Interesting insights.

On #2 , liberals have to wrestle with ethics. There is no ethics in Darwinism, or the biological world, because ethics belongs in the world of consciousness.

A difficult concept for right wingers.


"What I find hugely ironic is that much of fundamentalist America viscerally hates biological "Darwinism" (i.e. evolution) but they cherish economic "Darwinism" (i.e. lassie fair economics).

The flip side is also ironic, in that liberals accept biological evolution, but largely seek to eliminate its effects within our species.

Its not actually a laughing matter. I much prefer a kinder, gentler world, but I also acknowledge that all the beauty I see in the ecosystem is the result of a very long history of pain. That is a much more interesting philosophical question than most the questions which philosophers occupy themselves with...