SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bruce McGaughey who wrote (3322)12/8/1997 11:44:00 AM
From: Karl Zetmeir  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11603
 
Why is Dick Hewlett not considered a third party verification ... and Bateman is?

Does Dick own a bunch of MXAM stock?



To: Bruce McGaughey who wrote (3322)12/8/1997 12:26:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11603
 
Bruce, thanks for posting. IMO, to paraphrase Taylor "there's no rush to buy MXAM".



To: Bruce McGaughey who wrote (3322)12/8/1997 11:52:00 PM
From: Tim Hall  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11603
 
>>> and management also stated that it believes it may be able to establish a commercial ore body to a depth of 99 ft.ÿ The 99 ft. level is being discussed mostly because of the simplicity of the permitting process to a depth of 99 ft. Below that level, the permitting process becomes much more difficult.<<<

Give me a break, depth has nothing to do with permitting.

Tim Hall



To: Bruce McGaughey who wrote (3322)12/9/1997 1:17:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker  Respond to of 11603
 
"I would also like to caution you to understand that, unlike IPM, Maxam has no 3rd party verification of its assays or its process."

And here I thought that the market reacted to IPM's PR the way it did because IPM also had no 3rd party verification of its process. Guess Taylor read a different IPM PR than I did.