Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Effective Collaboration - Team Research for Better Returns: -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Ox who wrote (2628)	8/19/2013 12:30:04 PM
From: robert b furman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8247

Hi Ox, I think you are spot on and thanks to G here is the underlying story that is yet to be fully understood. If one would have fully understood single ionization vs batch ionization and its yield benefits from the process changes and bought vsea way back they would 've made a nice double in 2 years or so. I think Intc will show us the same growth but with verticle chip designs: seekingalpha.com Bob

To: The Ox who wrote (2628)	8/19/2013 2:40:18 PM
From: Return to Sender	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8247

S&P 500 June Quarter Earnings Growth Was Negative When Excluding The Financials forbes.com >EDIT - I am curious if looking at this post a year from now will make us laugh at my bullishness?< I'm laughing now Ox. Sorry I'm a bad seed. LOL Not so much about INTC as I think that stock would have less to fall in a truly awful market but BRCM? BRCM could bounce any time but next year's estimates may not mean anything.