Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The 56 Point TA; Charts With an Attitude -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Esteban who wrote (8990)	12/8/1997 12:46:00 PM
From: ivan solotaroff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 79324

Esteban: "I agree that TSEMF signal on 11/12 was questionable volume wise, but in the ball park." My objection to TSEMF was not on its volume; it was that it failed to signal because it closed on its low, not above. "Do you agree that ACTM gave a clear signal on 11/11?" Yes, I do. And here we might be on different pages, because I'm not sure I understand what triggers the sell signal. If I do understand correctly, ACTM gave it a few days ago when a second post-gap low violated the trendline drawn between the signal day's low and the following (higher) low. Look forward to you telling me what I'm doing wrong here. Ivan PS: Don't mention APCO or I'm likely to scream. Last Monday it was either Be smart and Buy APCO (I even recommended it loudly and often on the threads) or Be Stupid and Chase a Former Loser (a penny stock called IMES that was being touted off-line by some buds on the thread). I know by now that following "insider tips" is the fastest way to the poorhouse, but I got vengeful and stepped on my own. OUCH. (That's the reason I've been so "riskally correct" with you of late. I always preach what I can't practice.)