Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (40959)	9/3/2013 7:39:55 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

Perhaps my persistence of vision & ear is more attuned than yours, its quite clear in that talk that Fox asks Meyers the exact same question i posed you, why just impose this divine inference/interferrence & intervention only selectively? Meyer is full of inferrence pointing to everything that exists can be seen as caused by ID which is the same as pointing to nothing at all. Aluding to some interventions imposed on natural law that can be traced back to an intelligence projecting its will upon the whole, which again tells you nothing about the whys & hows all along the way. Again he forgets to mention random mutations are not random when superintended by natural selection which is real where his hypothesis is based entirely on the appearances which he weaves his story of allegory especially regarding DNA. He really is a petulant lad , again & again claiming "we do not know" when we certainly do have many very viable hypothesis, for evolution, for language,for mind/body cognizance etc.