SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Magnetics Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brian Lempel who wrote (10844)12/8/1997 6:35:00 PM
From: William T. Katz  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 12298
 
THE COLD HARD NUMBERS:

-----------------------------
From qtr ended Sept 27, 1997:

Net sales: $122,828
Gross margins: 26.7%
Gross profit: $32,819

R&D: $14,820
SGA: $2,088
-----------------------------

From the announcement, we know the best case scenario is a reduction of revenues by 30%. ("more than 30%" = ?)

Net sales for upcoming qtr < $85,980
Gross margins: 26% to 29%? [increase in MR volume = decrease yields?]
Gross profit: $22,355 to $24,934

Assume no increase in R&D or SGA [probably conservative since they are in transition and you would think R&D would be increased].

Net profit: $5,447 to $8,026

# shares, primary: 24,872
# shares, diluted: 31,100

BEST CASE SCENARIO BEFORE ONE-TIME CHARGES:

projected eps, primary: $0.22 to $0.32
projected eps, diluted: $0.17 to $0.26

With one-time charges figured in ($12.2 million), APM will lose between $6.75 to $4.17 million dollars this quarter. For the qtr ending Mar 98, the BEST CASE scenario is a rebound of up to 20% in revenue from these estimates.


I'll do some more number crunching tonight.

-Bill



To: Brian Lempel who wrote (10844)12/8/1997 7:20:00 PM
From: EyeDrMike  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12298
 
read it, and my interpretation is that the low yields refers to MR head production; i interpret it this way because i know MR heads typically have low yields in new production. But i may be wrong on my interpretation, i see how the yields might be in refernce to both.

Mike