Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (25117)	12/9/1997 1:57:00 AM
From: michael d kugler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

So all you can really say is, at the moment, you think or hope Mork is shorting in Canada. Simply saying it is not proof. Riley's in the same pickle with his mythical short squeeze. Simply saying it doesn't make it a reality. The market appears to be proving both of you wrong. Show me the basis for your allegations.

To: Pugs who wrote (25117)	12/9/1997 1:57:00 AM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

biz.yahoo.com Friday November 7 3:14 PM EST Shareholder of Rocky Mountain International Ltd. -- OTC: RMIL -- Sued by Admitted Short Seller BROOKLYN, N.Y.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 7, 1997--Riley G, an individual investor of Rocky Mountain International Ltd. (RMIL) responds to the press release issued Nov. 4, 1997 by Dempsey Mork of Development Bancorp (OTC:DVBC), and Magellan Capital Corp. after being served a summons of complaint in United States District Court, Central District of California. Case number: EDCV-97-300 RT (VAPx). 1. Riley G started a grass roots movement with other shareholders of ''Rocky Mountain International Ltd. (OTC:RMIL)'' after uncovering over 1 million shares in excess of the public float. These extra shares in the RMIL market are the direct results of abusive short selling by well-capitalized trading firms and individuals attempting to profit from market manipulation rather than company and market fundamentals. 2. Riley G recommends that all shareholders take physical delivery of their stock certificates. When delivery of stock certificates is demanded by a significant number of shareholders, the creators of nonexistent stock will be forced to clear the market of the extra shares that they flooded in to the market. We are not talking about legal shorting; we are talking about the selling of nonexistent shares. Thus keeping the price of a stock down in attempts to terminal short it. If a terminal short is made (stock value = $0) then the short sellers never have to worry about coving the extra shares that they flooded the market with. This is why every shareholder must demand delivery of their certificates! 3. Riley G states for the record, ''I am only a shareholder of RMIL stock and have no direct or indirect ties or links to Rocky Mountain International, LTD. (RMIL). I am also sick and tired of the short sellers and their associates on the Internet with their repeated attacks on other RMIL shareholders and myself, as they continue to slander a company that I am a shareholder of. It appears that the short sellers' main intent is to manipulate the price of RMIL down in an attempt to cause shareholders to sell off their shares for the personal gain and benefit of the short sellers.'' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Contact: Riley G Enterprises Riley G, 718/331-1960 Riley-G-Enterprises@psicop.com psicop.com

To: Pugs who wrote (25117)	12/9/1997 8:33:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs, Let's deepen the plot a little. Maybe you were short this stock, coverd down at the lower price range in small increments, then you and Riley came up with this idea of an alledged "short squeeze" to pump up the stock price to $4 so you could short it all over again. You know that there are other short positions out there so you figure you can squeeze them hard with a concerted effort. So maybe you all are hoping that it will go to $20 and when you perceive weakness in the stock, or create weakness by saying the Short Squeeze has been accomplished, you once again go short and make money on the downside. Maybe that is what you guys have been doing all this time. Then again, maybe not.... :0) But it sure sounds just about as credible as any scenarios you guys have put forth out here, including those regarding myself. My only purpose in being out here is that you over-enthusiastic "Yeas" don't get away with blindly suckering in "naieve" investors with this grand story of a short squeeze without looking at the managements performance in operating this company over the past couple of years. Hell, for that matter you guys might be selling right now and out here spewing your positive BS around hoping to prop up the price so you can say your collective *sses in this stock. Pugs, and Riley. Why don't you tell us publically, once again, if either one of you have sold any of your stock and how much of your original position you currently retain. As sheperds, you have a duty to maintain the confidence of your flock as you lead them to get sheared. Regards, Ron

To: Pugs who wrote (25117)	12/9/1997 9:26:00 AM
From: TLWatson59	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

PUGS and ALL: Bonjour! TA - RMIL 12/9/97 - The most apt description of the past few days of the technical behavior of RMIL IMO would be marking time in place or as PUGS might say bobbing and weaving with a feint here and there. Althought the volume has dried up significantly the target of the recent 1 5/8 low is still there. Perhaps it might be wise for those who have talked with the company about the expected financing might do themselves a favor and not comment since you set up straw men for others to knock down. Better the news ,if it is coming, comes out on it's own officially. Today's Wall Street Journal has an important article on the NASDAQ'S intention to delist some 3400 small cap stocks and look into the feasablilty enabling of better supervision over the BB market. We all could sure use that. As ever, plus bon chance mes amis. TLW