Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (743480)	10/2/2013 9:12:30 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1575583

Don't Pay Our Troops IT'S ONLY FAIR THAT THE MILITARY GETS SHUT DOWN, TOO, DAVID DAYEN ARGUES By Kevin Spak, Newser Staff newser.com Posted Oct 2, 2013 1:06 PM CDT (NEWSER) – President Obama says GOP bills that would end the shutdown for select parts of the government are "not serious" and "no way to fund a government." But on Monday he signed a bill just like that, ensuring that the military keeps getting paid. "How can I put this delicately? This is wrong," writes David Dayen at Salon. "It's a slap in the face to the 800,000 federal workers who do not deserve unfair treatment because their uniform is a different color." Ted Cruz was right to say that soldiers "should not have their paychecks held hostage." But neither should the "non-essential" public servants who save lives fighting disease and poverty. Or the "essential" air traffic controllers working without pay. Nor are soldiers alone in risking their lives—the FBI, CIA, and Forest Service firefighters are all feeling the shutdown pain. "It takes an exceedingly narrow conception of 'freedom' to claim that the only public servants who deliver it are the ones with guns and tanks." Giving the military special treatment sends the troubling message that it is "the superior function of the government, the only one worth protecting." Click for Dayen's full column.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (743480)	10/2/2013 11:38:38 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575583

The link's data is totally confused... It says that the national debt was $5.8 trillion when Obama took office, but that's what it was when Bush took office. By the time Obama took office, it was already at about $10 trillion. Additionally, you're confusing the deficit and the debt. They're not the same thing. >Like I said, before you post again, make sure it's been vetted by the Ministry of Truth. They don't like their shills making mistakes ... Oh, bugger off. -Z