SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (43944)10/11/2013 1:33:56 AM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86355
 
here kitty kitty kitty...



From: koan
9/1/2012 8:15:03 PM
1 Recommendation Read Replies (4) of 87475
TL found this wonderful song and I told him my experience with it.

I spent a night in the Santa Cruz mountains once stoned on acid at a seminar on "the irrational Man". Professor was real nervous with us all being stoned. Only a bunch of hippies were going to take a course on the irrational man-lol.

I played that song over and over. Closest I ever got to religion.

youtube.com

I spent the night in the bedroom OF some really sexy chick, except she wasn't there, just her cat.

It was a real female hippie bedroom. Candles, incense, scarves and a colorful bed spread. Off red/rust. I like cats and that cat and I had some cosmic understanding that night. God what a great night that was. Later in the night another women came and washed my hair.

All stoned on LSD all night long. I am happy in my old age knowing I engaged it at one time-g.



To: koan who wrote (43944)10/11/2013 4:37:07 AM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Thomas A Watson

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86355
 
You have a great sense of humour too! You are obviously coming around to seeing the light. < I feel landshark is one of the sharpest minds on this thread.>

You obviously have not read about the principles of science espoused by Einstein, Feynman and Popper. Let's test you. What were they? To make it easier for you, one said all data should be included, one said it would take only one person to prove him wrong, no consensus needed. Even if all others said he was right, only one would be needed to show he was wrong. One said a scientific theory should be falsifiable. He meat that if data shows up which shows the theory is false, then it's game over for the theory. The theory should be able to be shown to be false. So if all data proves the theory, such as snow and no snow both prove the theory, cold and hot both prove the theory, wet and dry both prove the theory, sea levels rising or falling both prove the theory, snow accumulating or dwindling in Antarctica both prove the theory, then the theory is in the realm of magic, not science. Which one said which?

Landshark, being a resident genius, [having destroyed his own environment bequeathed by Len], should be able to guess the right answers.

Mqurice



To: koan who wrote (43944)10/11/2013 1:54:07 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
Bilow

  Respond to of 86355
 
I doubt any of those would join Hansen and Mann.



And I feel landshark is one of the sharpest minds on this thread.

Thanks for the laugh.



To: koan who wrote (43944)10/11/2013 2:20:40 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 86355
 
That means you support and believe in the brownshirt mindset of fish brain. You really do not believe in free speech and debate. And if you wonder why you do get respect, it is because publicly suggesting a brownshirt mindset is the sharpest mind is the clearest true vision of your inner self respect.

Such simple analysis, does the sharp mind or the dullest of minds not get it.