SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (15372)12/9/1997 1:51:00 PM
From: George Mc Geary  Respond to of 50167
 
Mohan, DON'T YOU DARE GO BACK TO YOUR CORNER! Your post are needed on this thread and you balance IQ well.

Xircom XIRC broke out today (to the upside) one of the SOX componets. Was upgraded by Raymond James. George



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (15372)12/9/1997 1:55:00 PM
From: Chuck Molinary  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
Mohan,
DO NOT LEAVE! Your opinions are as valued as all others!

Especially your opinion on ORCL. Do you have one? Hard to believe 124 million shares traded as of 2pm.

ctm



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (15372)12/9/1997 2:03:00 PM
From: Tom Trader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
>>If that is not acceptable on this thread, may be this one should be my last post here<<

Hi Mohan--let me first say that I got the impression that Mary's remarks were somewhat tongue in cheek -- but if I am wrong regarding that, I don't think that you should stop posting here just because your point of view is contrary to that of Iqbal and some of his more ardent followers.

As you know, I am probably more in agreement with Iqbal than with you regarding the outlook for the market. Your postings serve a great purpose in helping maintain some perspective in terms of where things really are. As far as Iqbal's comments regarding the Asian markets, the sheer absurdity of suggesting that the bears are the ones who lost out during the recent decimation that the Asian markets have been through is obvious -- I was all set to point this out to him when you did so. There are times when I wonder if Iqbal reads what he is posting before pushing the "submit" button. He is way too knowledgeable and seasoned a trader to really believe some of the more outlandish conclusions that he espouses. The other reason why there may be this difference of opinion is that he may be commenting on a broad long term macro view and we are looking at it shorter-term. In the long run, I do believe that the Asian economies will come back and end up being viewed as star-performers down the line.

In any event don't stop posting here -- for one thing your perspective is much needed and besides it goes against the grain for me to see someone feeling that thir views are not welcome just because it does not agree with the majority on the thread.

Take care



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (15372)12/9/1997 2:06:00 PM
From: Mary Cluney  Respond to of 50167
 
Mohan, Mohan, Mohan >>>Now go back to your corners and come out advocating.
If Iqbal and a few others fell that way, I absolutely don't mind this being my last post here. And, I don't loose sleep over it. I have better things to worry about in life.<<<

Stop with this self pity schtick. You know that is not what I meant.

I chose you to get this off my chest only because you are not the most egregious offender and that I thought I could be fairly civil with you - without getting into too much of a big deal. But, you are choosing to take it in a way that I was hoping to avoid. Well, forget about what I said - continue in what you are doing and I will remove myself from this thread. I was not a participant here anyway. I'm sorry I butted in.

Regards,

Mary



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (15372)12/9/1997 9:28:00 PM
From: William H. Ferguson  Respond to of 50167
 
To Mohan

Don't leave the thread please, Mohan.

You give balance, badly needed herein.

I thought Mary's post would have read just as well had it been adressed to Iqbal L.

Cordially

William