SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (747763)10/18/2013 8:35:32 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572124
 
Should every citizen be required to openly carry a gun??????



To: Brumar89 who wrote (747763)10/18/2013 9:17:01 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572124
 
Scholarship published in the criminologic, sociologic, and legal literature in the last 30 years show that the defensive uses of firearms by citizens amount to 2.5 million uses per year and dwarf the offensive gun uses by criminals
That study was published by Gary Kleck of Florida State Univ in the 90's....... I actually talked to him and asked him to send me a copy of his paper. But his flaws and biases were also published.....

The 2.5 million figure would lead us to conclude that, in a serious crime, the victim is three to four times more likely than the offender to have and use a gun. Although the criminal determines when and where a crime occurs, although pro-gun advocates claim that criminals can always get guns, although few potential victims carry guns away from home, the criminal, according to Kleck’s survey, is usually outgunned by the individual he is trying to assault, burglarize, rob or rape. Kleck’s survey also included gun uses against animals and did not distinguish civilian uses from military of police uses. Kleck’s Interviewers do not appear to have questioned a random individual at a given telephone number, but rather asked to speak to the male head of the household. Males from the South and West were oversampled. The results imply that many hundreds of thousands of murders should have been occurring when a private gun was not available for protection. Yet guns are rarely carried, less than a third of adult Americans personally own guns, and only 27,000 homicides occurred in 1992..

In Professor Lott’s survey, children 14–15 years of age were found to be 14.5 times more likely to die from automobile injuries, 5 times more likely to die from drowning or fires and burns, and 3 times more likely to die from bicycle accidents than they are to die from gun accidents.[34]
Does that mean that if we triple the number of cars, fewer people will die in accidents..?. If we triple the number of bicycle riders, fewer bicycle accidents will occur.? Of course not, that will be a silly conclusion, but Lott says that if we triple the number of guns killings will go down???????? Explain that for me....