SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (235189)10/19/2013 10:25:13 AM
From: Alex MG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542201
 
the whole thrust of the WSJ op-ed piece was to dispel the "myth" that preschool helps educational wise in the long run, so I was hoping for some enlightenment on that idea

perhaps you should read more than the just WSJ op-ed pages and the Heritage Foundation if you want "enlightenment"



To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (235189)10/19/2013 2:29:07 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 542201
 
I can put this a bit differently, Bread. The WSJ piece cherry picked the negative evidence about educational benefit, misstated the consensus, and left itself open to the deficiency charge on the basis of its own internal evidence. The two links I gave you show that the consensus, period, forget advocacy, is that pre-k schooling, when done well, is a very good thing. The problem continues to be just how to fund it. And whether we as a country are capable of that kind of civic responsibility.