SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (751346)11/5/2013 7:12:56 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576289
 
It turns out that free will or force have almost nothing to do with whether something in the end contributes to the economy. Ideological claims to the contrary are irrelevant.


We have a bunch of ardent Austrian Schoolers here. Heck, Tenchu likes to claim that Keynesian economics was discredited in the 1970s and no one follows it any more. And he claims that nothing can stop wealth concentrations and his buddy i-node argues that it is, in fact, good for an economy.

It is a regular economics fun house....



To: neolib who wrote (751346)11/5/2013 8:50:30 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576289
 
Neolib,
Forget your parable's details, I supplied another.
I already answered that. There's a difference between recreation and vandalism.

If breaking windows were indeed a spectator sport, then there would be recreational value in manufacturing windows that are made to be broken.
You need to look at what happens all over in China. They build a nice building, and two years later smash it to build something else.
And you would defend that practice on the notion that it "contributes to the economy"?

How about building the South China Mall outside of Guangzhou? It's a living ghost town (see the PBS documentary here), but so-called "Keynesians" would defend such projects on the basis of "creating jobs."

China is building one of the worst bubbles of artificial economic activity, and it's going to collapse big time.

Tenchusatsu



To: neolib who wrote (751346)11/5/2013 9:01:02 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576289
 
"The point is, nobody can classify with any great success what is economically positive vs negative in a black and white sense."

I know if you give a homeless man a buck, he'll spend it. If you give a wealthy man the same buck, he'll probably just deposit it. Which is more stimulative?