Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Silicon Investor - User Site Discussion - Generally Unmodera -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alex MG who wrote (299)	11/19/2013 3:16:23 PM
From: Bear Down	Respond to of 1604

For you Alex, 10 bitcoins :-)

To: Alex MG who wrote (299)	11/19/2013 3:26:27 PM
From: elpolvo	2 Recommendations Recommended By Metacomet Ron Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1604

<Apparently because the company that owned SI at that time didn't provide the records of those transactions. So how much would it cost for those people to upgrade now to current lifetime status?> which begs the other 4 questions... 1) how much would it cost for the company who didn't provide the records of those transactions to upgrade those people now to current lifetime status? 2) how much would it cost for the current owners of SI to honor the integrity of their members and upgrade those people now to current lifetime status? 3) who should pay for this mistake? 4) why?

To: Alex MG who wrote (299)	11/19/2013 5:16:36 PM
From: N. Dixon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1604

I think I got some clarification from a friend of mine and SI reminded me about GO and the $199.00 lifetime cost. Legally, when one entity sells to another, the agreements they will look at the terms of the original members agreements as to whether or not they need to abide by them. I think that somewhere among all the change of hands, our "contract," which I never printed out or read that carefully, probably didn't guarantee us "Lifetime" for the site, but with that particular owner. I'm fine with ads. Just give me privacy on the site. I guess we did without it before and I don't see the need to fork up another 2 or 3 hundred dollars to have it here. I'm just not going to click on ads from this site. That's the only difference I can see. Here's my solution: ND