SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : OILEX (OLEX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richard L. Williams who wrote (1866)12/10/1997 11:15:00 AM
From: OFW  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4276
 
Regarding relationships between Oilex, Phoenix Reserves and Allen L. Burditt, II.

This is a question which has been raised on several occasions on this thread, most recently by Scott and Prudent Investor. The relationships do seem to raise several issues and questions. Here are just a few:

1. Allen L. Burditt, II is reported to be a "consultant" to Oilex.

2. Allen L. Burditt, II, according to an SEC filing by Oilex (August 1997) owns 100% of Phoenix Reserves, a privately held, non-public company.

3. Phoenix Reserves, according to an SEC filing by Oil Retrieval Systems (April 1997) is a "Bahamian Corp". It is one of seven companies involved in a purchase of stock from Oil Retrieval Systems (total 1,567,047 shares) on March 12, 1997. All seven of the companies, including Phoenix Reserves, is reported on the SEC filing as either "Bahamian Corp" or "British Virgin Islands".

4. Oilex acquired, according to an SEC filing by Oilex (August 1997), "from a related party of a 20% interest it owned in Oil Retrieval System, Inc. ("ORS") . . . Oilex issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock to the related party in exchange for its ownership of 1,205,420 common shares of ORS.".

5. Funscape (now Titan Energy), according to an SEC filing by Oilex (August 1997) issued 2.5 million shares of its common stock in exchange for all the outstanding shares of ORS.

6. Phoenix Reserves is the company to which Oilex transferred over 8.7million shares to acquire certain properties including the Wilson leases.

7. Phoenix Reserves and Oilex are co-plaintiffs in legal action currently pending (Cause 97-24160 in the 80th District Court, Harris County, Texas). In this suit, both Phoenix Reserves and Oilex report their principal place of business at 3050 Post Oak Blvd, Suite 1760, Houston, Texas. In addition, I am in personal possession of not less than two documents which show Allen L. Burditt, II, as an individual without company affiliation, operating from the same address of 3050 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 1760, Houston, Texas.

The above issues certainly raise, among many others, the following questions:

A. What exactly is the relationship of Allen L. Burditt, II to Oilex? Is he an independent "consultant" who advises the company or is he, in fact, the individual who controls the daily operation of the company? Is there a formal agreement for contractual services between Allen L. Burditt, II, as a consultant, and Oilex? If so, what are the terms of that agreement?

B. Since it appears that Oilex is sharing its office headquarters with both Phoenix Reserves and Allen L. Burditt, II, what formal agreements exist between the parties regarding the allocation of overhead expenditures such as office rent, utilities, telephone, supplies, clerical support and professional services? Are Phoenix Reserves and Allen L. Burditt, II reimbursing Oilex for some portion of these expenses?

C. Who is the "related party" to which Oilex issued 3,000,000 shares for the 20% interest in Oil Retrieval Systems?

D. What value did Oilex receive when it transferred over 8.7million shares to Phoenix Reserves to acquire certain properties? Was Allen L. Burditt, II, as sole owner of Phoenix Reserves and as a consultant to Oilex, involved in the negotiation and implementation of this share transfer? Are these properties still controlled by Oilex? If so, what production is Oilex currently generating from these properties?

E. Since it appears that both Oilex and Phoenix Reserves are interested parties in the pending lawsuit (Cause 97-24160), what formal agreements exist between the parties regarding the allocation of professional fees and expenses which are incurred by the co-plaintiffs in pursuing the action? In the event of a judgment against the defendants, what formal agreements exist between the parties regarding the allocation of any award or damages which may be ordered to benefit Oilex and Phoenix Reserves?

These are just a few of the many questions which investors (past, present or potential future) need to address when exploring the issue of relationships between Oilex, Phoenix Reserves and Allen L. Burditt, II. Hopefully, we'll soon find some answers.

Offie



To: Richard L. Williams who wrote (1866)12/10/1997 11:42:00 AM
From: Larry Sallee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4276
 
Rick- you ask the question I have no answer for- only a continuing question- why would some one who owns no stock spend what must be a huge amount of time and energy for what is I guess a generous act to inform us that we should sell like they have. Offie is posing a list of questions , some of them interesting for sure- I don't think Olex or any other Company would answer all of them. Right now I would rather have the Company answer questions like whats going on at Luling, how long before we know that the 1st well at Big foot produces, the second one? What kind of production do we have right now. Larry



To: Richard L. Williams who wrote (1866)12/13/1997 11:34:00 AM
From: Scott H. Davis  Respond to of 4276
 
RE: The motive for discusion. As long a former and possibly future "longs" participate in a thread with objective postings and questions, that can be a benefit to all. Several times before on other threads I
ignored an increasing amount of negative posts by investors who had done additional DD and shared with all. I wish I had been more attentive (SEXI and ISSM). Hopefully OLEX will turn it around. But the postings of Offie, Eric, Madly and Prude and the issues they have raised indicate that the risk is substantially higher that I thought 6 months ago.

Honest, open dialogue can be a benefit to all. Some people share out of a desire to help other investors (such as the TA threads, sharing of Web links, experiences with different newsletters and data sources, etc., as well as personal DD and opinions). Others have used or attempted to use SI threads to manipulate prices.

Conclusion? read with a open & suspicious mind. Scott