Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Research Frontiers (REFR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (8222)	1/5/2014 12:28:52 PM
From: N. Dixon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50166

He wrote the truth. You're criminals. ND P. S. Wu Tang says "hello" and while you're attacking....don't forget to show the people where I taught school

To: StockDung who wrote (8222)

1/5/2014 12:43:54 PM

From: ravenseye

Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50166

looky here ====> REFR mention
Message 21797794

Strategies & Market Trends : US vs Amr Elgindy - Trial Transcripts -- Ignore is Off

Public Reply | Prvt Reply | Mark as Last Read | File | Keep

Previous 100 | Next 100 | Previous | Next

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (40)	10/16/2005 3:46:41 PM
From: afrayem onigwecher	of 91

Cleveland also testified that although he received information from Mr. Royer on CATH, CWON, INIV, MDPA, TTRE, NAPH and REFR, he did not provide any of the information to Mr. Elgindy, and none was disseminated on the site. (See GX-JL-1.) Mr. Elgindy did not make any illegal trades in these stocks and any alleged insider trading in these stocks by others was not foreseeable to Mr. Elgindy. Mr. Elgindy therefore cannot be held responsible for any profits from any trading in those stocks. See Fruchter, 411 F.3d at 384 (noting the proper exclusion of profit from conduct of which the defendant was not aware); Hurley, 63 F.3d at 22. Yet again, the government claims that Mr. Elgindy should be required to forfeit his own and everyone else’s trading profits on these stocks.

To: StockDung who wrote (8222)	1/5/2014 12:59:53 PM
From: ravenseye	1 Recommendation Recommended By N. Dixon Respond to of 50166

Regulatory sanctions[edit] In November 2000, the NASD (now FINRA) sanctioned Asensio & Company Inc. and Manuel Asensio, for Short Selling, Trade Reporting, and Internet Advertising Violations.[5] In July 2006, the National Adjudicatory Council of the NASD upheld a hearing panel's ruling[6] that barred Asensio "from association with any NASD member in any capacity" and fined him $20,000. The NASD barred Asensio and his firm for failing to respond to requests for information. It found that Asensio made statements in research reports that criticized PolyMedica Corp. that were "misleading," by stating incorrectly that he was shorting the company when he was not, and by making similar disclosure rule violations.[7][8] Asensio denied wrongdoing.[8] All appeals were denied. In August 2007, Asensio Brokerage Services, Inc. nka Integral Securities, Inc. was expelled by FINRA for failure to pay fines and/or costs.[9] en.wikipedia.org lma(zz)o is that exposed enough? hurry, get your yellow journalist cohort to do a wikipedia edit!