Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gordon Quickstad who wrote (1669)	12/11/1997 12:31:00 AM
From: FMK	Respond to of 27311

Gordon, I was told of similar conversations with Cal Reed that would confirm several ot the points you challenge. Incidentally, I received a phone message from my accountant and financial advisor who tends to be consevative. He was pleased to announce that he has taken a position in Valence today! An enviable level to get in.

To: Gordon Quickstad who wrote (1669)	12/12/1997 12:57:00 AM
From: Tickertype	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

It seems the AOL poster whose comments I transfered here yesterday found out that his statements were disbelieved, and he is quite indignant about it. He talked to Cal again today, and is willing to give his name, time of the call etc, via e-mail to those who doubt. There was another post today, from a man I can personally vouch for in terms of his integrity, as I've been in private contact with him for some time now. His post follows. Incidentally, with the lack of official information coming from the company, if we are to provide some kind of proof (whatever that might be?) each time we learn something by talking to company officials, as a few individuals seem to suggest, then I'm afraid that the only thing we'll see on this thread is discussion about how much the stock went up or down today. We don't need to read the posts to know that. There'd be no more interesting updates from FMK, Mooter, and others! Subject: Re: Another Conversation W/Cal Date: Thu, Dec 11, 1997 17:09 EST From: TENORDIE Message-id: <19971211220900.RAA10134@ladder01.news.aol.com> I also talked to Cal today at around 4:45 eastern. I asked him the following: Is the battery marketable ? answer - yes Is it ready for production ? answer - it is being tested by OEM's, some are doing real good and some not so good but it is just a matter of fine tuning. Would you say that you are in the final stage in research and development ? answer - yes in general the battery is working very well. Do you think that the battery will be ready by at least Q1 98 or Q2 98 ? answer - yes, there are problems in working out the kinks in the new machinery but he thinks it just a matter of time. Were you fired? answer - no, I resigned and will be availble to the company for consultation if they need me. Is Lev Dawson mainly a marketeer? answer - yes Do you think everything is basically on track? answer -yes He answered all of my questions without hesitation and he stated that he returns all his calls and email as soon as he can. My conclusion is that this company is still in R&D but is on track in producing a marketable product. As to when this will happen, we will have to wait for the announcements. This is a speculative company and I would treat it as such. In the mean time, if you are savy, you might make some good money on these fluctuating prices. Good luck to all of us that are staying around!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!