SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: robert b furman who wrote (618)2/4/2014 10:44:46 AM
From: Kirk ©  Respond to of 26789
 
My guess is a TON of people will buy Intel for 4% yield so a put sold at 5% price is probably safe money either way.

I like the idea in theory of selling puts where you want to buy stocks but I don't like to tie up my capital needed to cover the strike price as often other stocks come along with a better bargain, but I understand the logic.



To: robert b furman who wrote (618)2/5/2014 9:15:50 AM
From: Kirk ©2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Gottfried
Sam

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26789
 
I wonder why people don't go to jail over this.....
JPMorgan shells out another $614M to resolve litigation. JPMorgan ( JPM) will pay $614M to settle allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by "knowingly originating and underwriting non-compliant mortgage loans" for insurance coverage by the FHA and Department of Veteran's Affairs. As part of the deal, JPMorgan has admitted that it approved thousands of loans that weren't eligible for FHA/VA insurance over more than a decade and that it failed to inform the agencies when it "discovered more than 500 defective loans that never should have been submitted."

"Beginning as early as 2002, JPMC falsely certified that loans it originated and underwrote were qualified for FHA and VA insurance and guarantees. As a consequence of JPMC’s misrepresentations, both the FHA and the VA incurred substantial losses when unqualified loans failed and caused the FHA and VA to cover the associated losses."
Shareholders foot the bills for criminal acts of fraud....
Morgan Stanley resolves MBS litigation for $1.25B. Morgan Stanley ( MS) has agreed to pay $1.25B to resolve litigation that Fannie Mae ( OTCQB:FNMA) and Freddie Mac ( OTCQB:FMCC) brought against the bank over the sale of mortgage-backed securities. Morgan Stanley will take a charge of $150M to boost its legal reserves in connection with the settlement, which will reduce Q4 EPS by $0.05 vs. a previously reported $0.50 excluding special items.
If you or I defrauded the government of $1.25B, you would think we'd serve time in jail. I guess the government knows they would tie it up in appeals court forever so getting money now to settle is worth throwing shareholders under the bus.



To: robert b furman who wrote (618)2/7/2014 11:05:44 AM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26789
 
Interesting story and a fracking graphic worth keeping

Europe Starts To Run, Not Walk, Away From Green Economics
Now European leaders are admitting quietly that they want to get into the game of fracking and other new drilling technologies that have caused an explosion of oil and gas production in the U.S.



Energy Policy: The media aren't paying much attention, but in recent weeks Europe has decided to run, not walk, as fast as it can away from the economic menace of green energy.

That's right, the same Europeans who used to chastise us for not signing the Kyoto climate change treaty, not passing a carbon tax and dooming the planet to catastrophic global warming.


Read More At Investor's Business Daily: news.investors.com