SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul V. who wrote (164699)2/7/2014 2:58:12 PM
From: tonto2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo

  Respond to of 224738
 
Paul, you are a fool.



To: Paul V. who wrote (164699)2/7/2014 8:34:34 PM
From: locogringo4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Honey_Bee
MichaelSkyy
Sedohr Nod
tonto

  Respond to of 224738
 
To to, wish you guys would make up your minds.

Why do you address him as To to?

Only a union THUG would talk that way.

A real school principal would not be so rude. (or stoopid)



To: Paul V. who wrote (164699)2/7/2014 9:17:05 PM
From: FJB  Respond to of 224738
 
What A Nice Host

Putin snubs Obama with racist-joke-making torch lighter

Read more: dailycaller.com

In an apparent a clear snub to President Barack Obama, Russia chose a politician and former Olympian who publicly made a racist joke about Obama and the first lady to light the torch for the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia.

Irina Rodnina, who lit the torch, tweeted a picture in the fall that appeared to show the first couple staring longingly at a banana while attending a basketball game. The tweet was sent without comment, and deleted after American officials grew angry. Still, she refused to apologize for the incident.

In addition to being the 2014 Winter Olympics torch lighter, Rodnina is “a member of Vladimir Putin’s United Russia [party] and a three-time Olympic champion,” The Hill reports. “She lit the torch with Vladislav Tretiak, a former goal-keeper for Russia’s national ice hockey team and also a three-time gold medalist.”

She was also joined by Alina Kabaeva, a former Olympic gymnast who is rumored to be Russian President Vladimir Putin’s girlfriend.



To: Paul V. who wrote (164699)2/8/2014 7:28:46 AM
From: tonto4 Recommendations

Recommended By
dave rose
locogringo
Sedohr Nod
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224738
 
You are clueless regarding fiscal responsibility...
$100,000,000 study how to get Americans to buy more Maple Syrup? Waste is everywhere.

Catfish oversight, weather radios and a Christmas tree tax: Meet the pork-filled $956 BILLION Farm BillThe massive five-years agriculture spending plan, signed Friday by President Obama, includes a $3 million plan for Christmas tree taxesMost of the bill covers food stamps, with the number of benefit recipients doubling since Obama took officeThe U.S. will spend $1 billion per year loaning money to sugar barons so they can keep prices stable and avoid overseas competitionAnother $100 million will go to study how to get Americans to buy more maple syrup$1 million will buy weather radios for rural Americans, despite plunging hundreds of weather apps for smartphones and plunging access rates
By DAVID MARTOSKO, U.S. POLITICAL EDITOR

PUBLISHED: 18:15 EST, 7 February 2014 | UPDATED: 19:33 EST, 7 February 2014





98 shares

50

View


comments



The federal government pays for a $15 million 'wool trust fund,' runs a $170 million program to protect catfish growers from overseas competition, sets aside $3 million to promote Christmas trees, funds another $2 million to help farmers sell more sheep, and plunks down $100 million researching how to get Americans to buy more maple syrup.

And that spending is just three one-hundredths of one per cent of the Farm Bill that President Barack Obama signed Friday in Michigan.

Liberal and conservative watchdogs alike are hopping mad at what they say are pork-barrel projects included in the five-year agriculture spending law as home-state perks to lawmakers that are unneeded or redundant.

There's a new 15-cent levy on every live-cut Christmas tree, a proposal that Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack had blocked but will now be beyond his control. Tree growers will put the money into a fund for 'industry-funded promotion, research, and information program[s],' but the cost will inevitably be passed on to consumers.


+7

A table made from a pork barrel? Obama signed the nearly $1 trillion Farm Bill in Michigan on Friday


+7

Like maple syrup on your stack? The feds will plunk down $100 million in the coming years to help the industry lure more breakfast eaters

The Farm Bill also includes $1 million in grant money to buy weather radios, despite the ubiquity of weather.com and the plummeting costs of both Internet service and smartphones.

And it continues a $200 million 'market access' program that has paid companies like Fruit of the Loom and McDonalds to run commercials.

One grant from that fund even funded a reality TV show in India aimed at promoting cotton. Another paid Welch's $844,000 to hawk grape juice outside the U.S.


More... 3-D pizza printing, utility pole dancing and a $100,000 OUTHOUSE: How the federal government wasted taxpayer dollars in 2013 US State Department spends $1 MILLION on a single granite sculpture to decorate new embassy in London State Department finalized a $5million order for custom crystal wine glasses for American embassies just hours before the government shutdown State department spends $630,000 'buying' Facebook likes only for Inspector General to find that less than two percent of its new 'friends' are truly engaged Obama declares war on mousepads and coffee mugs in bid to trim government's excessive spending on swag The ultimate pork barrel project? Documentary film records quest for Congressional funding for a 'Museum of Government Waste'

The conservative Club For Growth called the legislation, which took members of Congress three years to write, 'a "Christmas Tree" bill where there’s a gift for practically every special interest group out there with a well-connected lobbyist.'

It's $956 billion of spending overall in a ten-year period, sketched out in legislation 959 pages long – nearly $1 billion per page.

But most of that money goes to food-stamp and nutrition programs, which are administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The 10-year spending total for those entitlements will hit $756 billion under the new law.


+7

Get ready to pay more: Christmas tree growers will put millions into a Farm Bill-approved fund to hep them with marketing, with consumers likely footing the bill in the form of higher prices


+7

Food stamp costs make up most of the Farm Bill -- more than 80 per cent


+7

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack (R) had blocked the Christmas tree tax in the past, but is now powerless to stop it

That amount is $8.7 billion less than the previous Farm Bill included, but trends suggest it may have to be revised. Since President Obama took office, the number of Americans receiving those benefits has nearly doubled.

One in five American households receive food stamps today. More than 1 million people were added to the rolls in 2013, including residents who live in the country illegally.

In the year 2000 the entire food stamp program cost $17 billion. Last year that figure was $78 billion.

The rest of the Farm Bill, all $200 billion of it, includes some subsidy payments to members of Congress and their families who are engaged in agriculture.

The left-leaning Environmental Working Group reports that in 2013, In 2013, more than $237,000 was paid to federal lawmakers and their spouses. All but two were Republicans.

Still, Democrats scuttled a bipartisan House amendment that would have required public disclosure of such payments. North Carolina Republican Rep Virginia Foxx and Minnesota Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison pushed the transparency tweak unsuccessfully last year.

Also on some watchdogs' lists of Farm Bill waste is an estimated $1 billion per year taxpayers lend out to protect the sugar industry against price fluctuations, shielding it – mostly in the form of just three companies – from being undercut by cheaper imported sugar.

The result also raises sugar prices nationwide.


+7

How much in taxes? Baaaah! The U.S. sheep industry is thriving, but taxpayers will shell out $2 million to help ranchers sell even more


+7

Back to Washington! Obama signed the Farm Bill in front of John Deere tractors, representing the big agribusinesses that will largely benefit from the new spending law

'By keeping an unnecessary catfish inspection program and refusing to reform crop insurance or eliminate the unnecessary sugar program, members of both parties and both chambers missed a golden opportunity to fundamentally shift agriculture policy from government-centric to one that embraces the free market and common sense,' said David Williams, president of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance.'

And the left-leaning Citizens Against Government Waste is no more enamored with the final law.

'The bill is a disaster for taxpayers and has the potential to be even more expensive and wasteful than the abysmal 2008 Farm Bill that it is replacing,' the group's president, Tom Schatz, complained.

Obama signed it into law at Michigan State University alongside Michigan Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow.

He called it a 'Swiss Army knife,' with something for everyone, including the catfish lobby.

Taxpayer lobby groups failed to cut that industry's hand-out from the Farm Bill, despite pointing out that there's already a similar program funded by the Food and Drug Administration.

Share or comment on this article

Read more: dailymail.co.uk
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on F acebook



To: Paul V. who wrote (164699)2/8/2014 8:56:55 AM
From: chartseer1 Recommendation

Recommended By
tonto

  Respond to of 224738
 
I have as yet seen a Federal Budget that eliminates waste. I cannot remember an actual lower budget. I do experience fiscal years closings where everyone is hustling to get rid of funds so there isn't any surplus. GOD forbid if the year ended with a surplus, next years appropriated funds might be less and we could not have that, could we?