Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cAPSLOCK who wrote (1706)	12/11/1997 6:19:00 PM
From: Hunter Vann	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4736

Goodness gracious, you must simply be a person who is quite senstitive . The word 'naive' is really not that brutal of a word. My underlying tone was that Mr. Linskey might simply be accused of trusting people too much. This may be a direct result of his own personality or maybe even a social factor resulting in his interactions with other people. I'm not sure, and I really don't think it matters. One can possibly construe that it's a compliment.(not you of course) Perhaps you misunderstood the reference to Michael Jordan so let me clarify that as well. The basic premise of this reference was to show what a shame it would be for Mr. Jordan to continue his baseball career when he's obviously so much more talented on the basketball court. Not only an injustice to him, but to the fans as well. This comparison was made to Martin's involvement in penny stocks, instead of companies whose future and outlook appear to be more prosperous and fruitful. Here it is in a nutshell: 'Waste of talent'. So if you also examine this statement a little further, one could also construe this as a compliment. And finally, you obviously don't see me cause I've been waving for the last 20 minutes :)