SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dennis Roth who wrote (182928)3/9/2014 1:49:44 PM
From: Bearcatbob2 Recommendations

Recommended By
dave rose
Hannoverian

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 206185
 
Good stuff as always Dennis. I wonder what our ability to build such ships is. Perhaps the requirement could be phased in as the ships become available. I assume there are some free trade agreements that might come into play.

As for Markey - he is one of the politicians on my list of complete wackos. His elevation to the Senate is a sad commentary on the Massachusetts electorate. She and Elizabeth Warren make a great pair.

Bob



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (182928)3/9/2014 6:03:01 PM
From: sm1th  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206185
 
While the changes would make LNG exports more expensive than using foreign tankers because no such U.S.-flagged vessels currently exist,
I haven't checked, but find this a little suprising. General Dynamics built about a dozen LNG tankers in late 70's - mid 80's in Quincy MA before closing that shipyard. They are likely near the end of their useful lives, but at least some should still be in service.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News