SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (775131)3/16/2014 11:00:06 AM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations

Recommended By
TideGlider
TopCat

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573439
 
the daughter said she didn't know the boy, so the boy was trying to rape his daughter.

nuff said. I feel sorry for your daughter since you would let anyone rape her while watching



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (775131)3/16/2014 11:13:40 AM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573439
 
I agree, he shouldn't have been there....What a shock to the father!



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (775131)3/16/2014 12:57:15 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573439
 
One of the goals of College Board president David Coleman is to more closely align the test with current high-school curricula. And the curriculum the folks over at College Board are referring to is Common Core. Coleman was one of the architects of Common Core, and took over the presidency of the College Board in May 2012. “The Common Core provides substantial opportunity to make the SAT even more reflective of what higher education wants,” Coleman said.

As the Washington Post reported: “The SAT’s writers appear to be doing two things: changing what it tests; and making it easier. . . . It’s no accident that this push comes from a College Board President who helped produce the K-12 Common Core standards, which aim to establish a national grade-school curriculum.”

The “making it easier” component is consistent with the standardization of mediocrity that Common Core national standards and tests represent. AEI’s Rick Hess calls it the Common Core-ification of the SAT. One of the major new changes to the SAT includes eliminating difficult words. Hess gives examples such as “punctilious” and “phlegmatic.” “I’m not sure,” Hess writes, “I regard these words as all that ‘obscure.’ And, in any event, I don’t know how you make a test more rigorous by dumbing down expectations for vocabulary.”

This is precisely the type of dumbing-down Dr. Sandra Stotsky warned about in her many critiques of the literary content — or lack thereof — of Common Core. Stotsky warned that college readiness will decrease as a result of Common Core English Language Arts (ELA) standards, which include a marked shift from fiction in favor of informational texts. That decrease in college readiness, she argues, is due to the simplicity of such informational texts. “By reducing literary study,” Stotsky notes, “Common Core decreases students’ opportunity to develop the analytical thinking once developed in just an elite group by the vocabulary, structure, style, ambiguity, point of view, figurative language, and irony in classic literary texts.”

Common Core includes an implicit reduction in the variety and difficulty of vocabulary by over-emphasizing informational texts (70 percent of a teacher’s instructional materials must be derived from informational texts by the end of high school). The new SAT revamp is explicitly reducing the level of vocabulary it expects college-aspiring students to grasp.

There is massive opposition to Common Core from parents, teachers, and taxpayers. Even the teachers’ unions have voiced opposition to the assessments and implementation. With colleges increasingly questioning the efficacy of the SAT (it has lost market share to the ACT, colleges report it fails to reflect student ability, etc.), perhaps this alignment to Common Core will further motivate universities to disregard the test altogether, or to discard it in favor of other assessment instruments.

Whatever happens, one thing is sure: The homogenizing of American education continues.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (775131)3/16/2014 2:58:56 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573439
 
On the one hand, it's tragic but the young man's life and death can have meaning ... as an example to others to not sneak into people's houses at night.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (775131)3/22/2014 1:20:33 PM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
TideGlider

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573439
 
Feminist Professor Charged in Assault on Pro-Life Teen

Pictured is 16-year-old Thrin Short, the victim of the assault.

University of California at Santa Barbara Associate Professor Mireille Miller-Young was charged with one misdemeanor count each of theft, battery and vandalism in the March 4 incident, Santa Barbara County District Attorney Joyce Dudley announced Friday. The charges came days after 16-year-old Thrin Short and her parents met with prosecutors.

Thrin told authorities what she told FoxNews.com earlier this month: She, her older sister Joan, 21, and some other pro-life activists were holding signs and demonstrating in a free speech zone on the bucolic campus March 4 when Miller-Young, who also teaches courses on pornography, went berserk.

The sisters say they distributed nearly 1,000 informational pamphlets during the event, which was organized by the Riverside-based nonprofit Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust. Things took an unexpected turn when, according to Short, Miller-Young approached the demonstrators and a group of students who had gathered.

During the March 4th event, 13 students with the Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust distributed 900 pro-life informational pamphlets to UCSB students and displayed several large, handheld signs with graphic images of abortion victims. Though several UCSB students expressed gratitude for the pro-life messages, Miller-Young approached the group and threatened to forcibly remove their anti-abortion materials.

“We don’t need to listen to these people!” Miller-Young shouted, according to witnesses. “They don’t have our permission to be here. Should we tear down their sign?”

Then, as captured on a cell phone video published by the Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust, Miller-Young grabbed a sign from one of the members of the group and carried it into a nearby building.

Two of the pro-life students—16-year-old Thrin Short and her 21-year-old sister Joan—followed Miller-Young into the building. However, the professor entered an elevator and then pushed the students away when they tried to follow her. Thrin was left with scratches on her arms from the professor’s shoves.

According to a report filed by the UCSB Police Department, Miller-Young destroyed the pro-life poster with scissors in her office. When asked by a police officer if there had been a struggle for the sign, the professor simply said, “I’m stronger so I was able to take the poster.”