SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (783405)5/4/2014 4:13:22 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577928
 
The point is that "life in prison" as a public safety imperative used to eliminate threats has no reigns. The criminal law generally prohibits undesirable acts. Acts like drunkenness and circumstances like alcoholism, drug addiction, domestic violence, drug trafficking and human trafficking represent a growing and ungovernable threat to public safety. In addition, The world's General Assembly has determined "Heinous, Fast-Growing Crimes of Human, Drug Trafficking will continue to Ravage the World's Economies."

Based on your premise, which you haven't been able to qualify in any other way, we should be incarcerating a huge percentage of the population for life, for the sake of public safety alone.

un.org

Koan: "Life in prison is all one can do logically from an
intelligent and humane point of view..."



To: koan who wrote (783405)5/4/2014 4:33:14 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577928
 
Koan: Life in prison is all one can do logically from an
intelligent and humane point of view...


Your logic which meets no other crime criteria except public safety, suggests we should have only one sentence, "life in prison."

After all, the statistics from the Ministry of Justice showed that prisoners who were released in 2010 following a short sentence committed a total of 83, 107 crimes. So short term incarceration is a threat to public safety. This is what we are left with when resolution and reconciliation are removed from our criteria to have just outcomes.
dailymail.co.uk



To: koan who wrote (783405)5/4/2014 4:37:15 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577928
 
If we are going to have alcohol legal, pot should be legal as it is a lot less dangerous...
That is your opinion. Pot is a gateway way drug to LSD, heroin and cocaine. The implications are enormous and America's War on Drugs must start on the casual user.