Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (784334)	5/11/2014 7:41:59 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578027

Ten, he was not rationalizing it and he was not condoning it. He was making a logical deduction from the religious criminals point of view. Which he was using to set up HIS argument as to why we should spend more money on educating girls. Don't just get into haten what I say, read the above real carefully until you get it. He was saying the best weapon against Haram and the Taliban, since they think that way, is to educate the girls. Instead of putting hundreds of millions/billions into drones, put it to into educating the girls and you will combat the Taliban much more that way. Think about it. <<In that sense, Boko Haram was behaving perfectly rationally — albeit barbarically — when it kidnapped some of the brightest, most ambitious girls in the region and announced plans to sell them as slaves.