Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert E. Hall who wrote (9924)	12/13/1997 10:22:00 AM
From: Jane Hafker	Respond to of 39621

Robert, absent of any explanation of the dread Talmud--the BABYLONIAN Talmud, the word BABYLON\|IAN of course calling up the most horrible of occult and satanic, rightfully so, references. Because that is in fact where the 6,000 practice of serving satan began, and that any student of advanced history knows, of course. I refer each and every human on earth to three readings of The Two Babylons by Prof. Hyslop, Professor at Cambridge and international scholar of 1916 vintage. After anyone has read it at least twice, I will be happy to debate with that non-believer that satan did not in fact set up his kingdom and export it to America in 1997 from Babylon 6,000 years ago. BUT I DIGRESS AS USUAL. I have researched the dread and awful Talmud, which of course I expected to be nothing but an occult plant, and smoke screen to lead one straight to the lap of Madame Blavatsky herself. Or Bishop Pike, or even Crowley. My initial quest has proven a failure. Apparently it is a convoluted and much expounded on version of the Torah. Emile, or Robert, what do you think of the Torah? I believe it of course is the object of great debate here, and I wonder what your views are of Jews who study the Torah. Do you think the Torah is the problem, and perhaps the way to digress into such things as the Talmud? Just curious about your feelings of study of the Torah.

To: Robert E. Hall who wrote (9924)	12/13/1997 10:27:00 AM
From: Alan Markoff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39621

Robert, There are some major omissions in Emiles post. Who is it that fall in verse 11 (of Romans 11) is that the Church that has salvation established for them in Jesus. How do you plan to make them jealous when you have a religon that is not even resembling anything close to the Old Testament as Emile says the JEWISH FABLES that is blasphemy complete. Verse 12 Who is it that fell? Verse 14 Paul says to povoke them that are his flesh. Paul has stated that he is an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin.Why can't you leave the Jews alone. In order for you to push your religion on people you must make God appear to be a liar and unfaithful and I am sick of it ( Emiles own admission ) I believe Emile was on track when he questioned how could this be in Romans 11, but then he was decieved in the answer that came to him. I wish you would all stop saying you love Israel because such love is not wanted. If you show concern it might be accepted. Nancy based on Emiles post #8694

To: Robert E. Hall who wrote (9924)	12/13/1997 12:04:00 PM
From: Alan Markoff	Respond to of 39621

"You want to invalidate the pure Word of God by your traditions of race and culture" Excuse me Robert my race and culture is who wrote Gods word (Bible). Maybe you wish to say that's not true as well. I looked at Emiles post I must tell you it made me feel like Bugs Bunny sure was allot of jumping around to prove a point,he even referred to the book of fables to prove his point (Old Testament) I love how people like to twist things. Also I like what Jane asked you. What is your views on the Torah? There is reference of Antichrist rejecting both the father and son, there are also many racist groups who love Jesus (they claim) they also have the same beliefs as you because they use the same verb age (ANTICHRIST)against the Jews. Tell me Robert all the Jews that were Killed in the Holocaust are they going to Hell. I would love your view on this. Alan