Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (794256)	7/8/2014 8:23:09 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Respond to of 1579680

>> I think that someone who seeks to use contraception is taking responsibility for their lives. It isn't personal responsibility unless he/she is paying for it. >> Limiting access to contraception is intruding into their personal lives because your particular branch of Christianity has sincerely held beliefs that God has instructed them to gain control over women's bodies. No one has limited access. That's idiotic. What was limited is the requirement -- which wasn't part of the law in the first place -- that employers pay for it. And even then only when it was in conflict with a very small number of employer's religious views, which obviously is more important than other provisions of the law (i.e., "FIRST Amendment").

To: combjelly who wrote (794256)	7/8/2014 9:24:04 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1579680

CJ, I think that someone who seeks to use contraception is taking responsibility for their lives. Still a rather low standard for "personal responsibility" when you expect someone else to foot the bill. "Either you pay for my pills, or you pay for my pregnancy." See the problem here? I bet you don't ... Tenchusatsu