Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : STOCKS WITH ATTITUDE TEAM - FA/TA AND EVERYTHING ELSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cornstock who wrote (179)	12/14/1997 4:30:00 PM
From: TheInvestor	Respond to of 2377

Peg, I am sorry for drifting the topic of discussion into other points of view. I guess, it was not intentional. We started speaking our minds and things get carried away. Sorry. Although Chris comes across like he thinks the POW team don't know what they are doing, he does provide some substantial information that we should consider in choosing stocks. I think that was the goal of his messages. We should not get angry at him for criticizing our methods. We should take the good out of the message and discard the negative. Much like getting honey from a bee. They can sting you know, if you are not carefull. I am full of cliches aren't I? With that said I am living this thread, unless its to the purpose of its creation, Sorry, did not plan to be so involved here, Ben P.S. Peg, Instock thought I did a good job this morning, so why are you offended? You can answer me via email if you like.

To: Cornstock who wrote (179)	12/14/1997 4:38:00 PM
From: Chartgod	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2377

You've got my vote {e-mail} Peg... james

To: Cornstock who wrote (179)	12/14/1997 5:36:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Respond to of 2377

No one is getting flamed here only questioning the intent of a POW to be made on Sunday. the only personal attacts have been against other and not has been made to violate the term of service. Negatives are vital for proper evaulation for the novice investor who reads these threads. GB

To: Cornstock who wrote (179)	12/14/1997 11:10:00 PM
From: Rich In Sac	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2377

Peg...this post isn't directed to you. It's just where I left off (in fact, I agree with you wholeheartedly) To the abusers of this message board, Last night when I logged off of this thread I was on message post #55. For the past hour I've been waddling through fluff and BS and I'm only on post #180. Oh...well...only 127 more posts to look through...you think I'll ever get to the Pick Of the Week? Let's try and keep this thread open only to discussing individual stocks and the Pick Of the Week...please...pretty please?!? As you can tell I'm a 'lurker' and not a 'poster'. I never really thought that I would post a message on these boards. But, some people know how to draw a 'lurker' out of his shell. Always thought of myself as a learner and not a teacher. But this childishness is really getting ridiculous. KNOCK IT OFF...please?...pretty please?!? Thanks, Rich