Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jerome who wrote (1693)	7/17/2014 2:50:15 AM
From: Kirk ©	1 Recommendation Recommended By Brian Sullivan Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26838

Really? Would it be rude if I said your argument was clueless? Hi Kirk, Your idea about reducing taxes to corporation to zero has been tried in Kansas. Hard to believe any state was able to eliminate the 35% federal corporate tax rate. If they reduced THE STATE TAX to zero, it would only MATCH Texas which probably is more business friendly with better ports. Why would anyone in that part of the country choose Kansas over Texas if they still had to pay the 35% Federal tax rate? Maybe if they like tornadoes or inherited property from Auntie Em... Anyway, Obama cut taxes when he wanted growth so we know Democrats know how to get jobs and economic growth. Cut taxes on everyone. The trouble is they can't pay off all the bribes the special interests gave them to get elected if they cut the corporate tax rate. Also, I've already proven that if you reduce federal taxes by $100 and give it all to the CEO as a bonus, then we get MORE taxes from this since he is in a higher bracket (39% vs 35%).... so cut it to zero and encourage giving it all to employees as salary (were you not the one calling for higher wages?) It just blows my mind how clueless so many are about how much blood leeches can suck from the productive for their special interests while they expect the hosts to stick around when Ireland, Singapore, UK, etc. offer a more attractive home base.

To: Jerome who wrote (1693)	7/17/2014 9:53:16 AM
From: robert b furman	2 Recommendations Recommended By Ken Adams Kirk © Respond to of 26838

Lets go beyond the politics: deptofnumbers.com deptofnumbers.com Third best job growth of the states - yea that's a flop alright: deptofnumbers.com I know facts are hard for liberals to deal with so we go to mud flinging and politics. Shame on you Jerome. My bet is that republican gets into office as assuredly as Walker was never going to get re-elected after the recall vote won him more support than the original election. The people vote for those who fight for jobs sometimes. Then the others vote for those who take from the working class and redistribute to the non working class. Its a decision as to how one views America.