Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the traveler who wrote (1702)	7/17/2014 10:55:22 AM
From: robert b furman	Respond to of 26874

Banter? Heck it would take the truth and a 2x4 to change Jerome's lib/progressive views.LOL Bob

To: the traveler who wrote (1702)	7/17/2014 11:31:46 AM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26874

What gets me is they ignore their own facts and can't share their own talking points Larry, Moe, and Curly en.wikipedia.org Larry cut taxes lower than Bush 2 and said it was to stimulate the economy but he raised rates to what they were on the working poor after the election (2% payroll tax) and greatly increased taxes on the rich to pay for his ACA. Moe said it was unpatriotic for corporations to follow our current laws to pay the lowest possible taxes to make more money for their shareholders. Curly now wants us to believe that cutting taxes is not positive for economic growth. So Did Moe say his boss was unpatriotic? Did Curly say his boss wasted taxpayer money cutting taxes to stimulate the economy to get reelected? It just baffles the mind the lies some will tell rather than admit they believe they know how to spend money better than the people who earned it and they want the law to take it from the productive so they can emulate Detroit.