SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Cityscape Financial (CTYS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rational who wrote (1821)12/14/1997 6:42:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2544
 
Sankar, on October 18th, post #1048, you stated categorically, I am tempted to buy on Monday. The same day on post 1064, you pulled rank on me since you are a Professor of Finance at a very well respected university and I am only a poor farmer that drives turnip trucks for a living. You went so far to support your superior judgment to post a paper you did on these types of securities (but did not know that the norm is conversion at the price of the stock at time of issue or a premium thereof), and of course questioning my basic tenet (what does a farmer knows?) that only a company with its back to the wall will accept a floorless clause in any equivalent security. On October 19,(post 1091) you suggested that B&S best strategy would be to buy out the converts and that the price will not decline below 6 (then you pulled the normal dirty trick, if you are so sure that it will go to 3 or under why don't you short it). On October 22 (post 1264) you are still unwavering and used the term "feel good about the stock".

Sankar, you are a respected member of the SI community, we all respect the fact that you are a Professor of Finance and had a stint working at a Fed Reserve bank, so your word carry much more weight than that of a techie/farmer that dropped out of high school. It is just that this farmer does not get brow beaten by professors anymore (nor ever did), since this farmer is himself a professor, amongst few other things. Having very little faith in my own professorial forecasts, I have no reason to have more faith in other professor's forecats either.

You have stayed bullish long after I came to the thread and fought my comments bitterly and ridiculing them, thus personally persuading other on the thread to view my perspective of the coming demise as that of a lunatic, you thus do bear partial responsibility for their losses and rewriting history should be left, as I said before to winners of wars, not you and I. You should simply end this argument by saying: "sorry, I am human, I erred".

Zeev