SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ron who wrote (258428)8/20/2014 12:39:08 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542109
 
None of these events happens in a vacuum.... The tinder was there... Michael Brown was the spark.

Indeed. That is what people who say, "What's the big deal about one black kid getting killed? That happens all the time." As I've read on RW blogs--they of course go on to cite murder statistics in black communities and how many murders black people commit themselves.

But it is pretty clear to me reading some of these reports that this was an already inflamed community, racially polarized. Missouri was a border state back in the day, and there are still some very racist elements in it. IMHO, what we are seeing is a combination of a community that has had "enough" of white BS as well as some undisciplined black adolescent BS that doesn't know how to effectively get things done.



To: Ron who wrote (258428)8/20/2014 12:46:57 PM
From: Alex MG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542109
 
Nothing really new here, except maybe the militarization of local Police departments after 911.

I would say the continued growth of disparity of wealth and our eroding public schools and our eroding job opportunities is contributing... increased poverty increases social unrest... refusing to even increase the minimum wage... I used to never see people on the street, begging for money close to where I live, it was always in other parts of town... I see it more often now, and this is while the ultra-wealthy are getting even more wealthy



To: Ron who wrote (258428)8/20/2014 12:52:40 PM
From: Steve Lokness  Respond to of 542109
 
<<<< The tinder was there... Michael Brown was the spark. Nothing really new here, except maybe the militarization of local Police departments after 911.>>>>

I think you are spot on and appreciate the comments from someone who has been there. What is taking place in Ferguson now will likely only further the escape by whites from the area to create yet more segregation, more polarization - all IMHO.



To: Ron who wrote (258428)8/20/2014 1:26:20 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 542109
 
I think 70% black Ferguson needs to put up candidates, vote, and change their town.



To: Ron who wrote (258428)8/20/2014 1:35:57 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 542109
 
Ferguson Is Mostly Black. Why Is Its Government So White?

By Jordan Weissmann
slate.com

Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson.Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images

Ferguson, Missouri, is a majority-black city governed mostly by whites. The mayor is white. The police chief is white. The police force is 94 percent white. Only one of its six city council members is black. These facts, as much as anything, have shaped the protests over the police shooting of Michael Brown. Ferguson, with a 67 percent black population, is a place where the largest community has little political voice.

Why is that? David Kimball, a political science professor at the University of Missouri–St. Louis, has studied the dynamics of race and elections in St. Louis proper. He says that the pattern in Ferguson is common throughout the city’s inner-ring suburbs, where blacks have gradually replaced whites in recent decades.

The issue boils down to who votes. Ferguson is roughly two-thirds black, but compared with the city’s whites, the community is younger, poorer (the city has a 22 percent poverty rate overall), and, as the New York Times recently wrote, somewhat transient, prone to moving “from apartment to apartment.” All of these factors make black residents less likely to go to the polls, especially in low-turnout municipal elections. And so whites dominate politically. “The entire mobilization side of it is what accounts for the difference,” Kimball said.

To illustrate the point, Kimball told me about a recent school board election in which the city’s racial fissures came to the fore. In 2013, Art McCoy, the young and promising school district superintendent, was suspended by the board without explanation. McCoy, who later resigned, was black, as were three-quarters of the district’s students. Six of the school board’s members were white, while the other was Hispanic. Local outrage grew quickly.

“It’s a white school board and then you have this black superintendent, who so many people are impressed with,” Esther Haywood, president of the St. Louis County branch of the NAACP, told the St. Louis Post Dispatch. “Why are they trying to get rid of this black superintendent? We don’t know.”

In the wake of the controversy, three black candidates chose to run for the school board; despite the anger over McCoy’s ouster, only one managed to win a seat.

“I think the school board election is illustrative, because all the elements are there," Kimball said. "You’d think, OK, this is going to motivate the African American community. We’re going to see some changes. It’s kind of depressing from the standpoint of democracy serving all the constituents in the community.” In other words, democracy doesn’t always serve the poor.