To: epicure who wrote (258858 ) 8/25/2014 2:34:30 PM From: koan Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543131 We have had different experiences in life it appears. I found, by and large, my teachers at my community college to be as good as my teachers at my state college or the university I attended. I feel I learned equal amounts at all three institutions for all practical purposes. My real awakening happened at San Jose State which had a top notch philosophy department, not the university of Washington. Robert Sawyer and Seven Pinker talk about the "moral arrow through time" i.e. societies become more moral as they evolve. Wisdom, self actualization and moral civilizations are all learned. And they are mostly learned from liberal arts. Our constitution was based on philosophy, not science. Democracy is a philosophical idea. The foundations of our civilization lie in the works of the ancient Greeks as you know. In their philosophical discussions e.g. Lucretious on The Nature of Things which you read about . The ideas of Republics and illusion. Self actualization, as Maslow explains can only happen when other needs are met. But one still has to have that spark (which is most often struck in college) that ignites the imagination and then decides to work on self actualization. Although I admit it does not work for many who seem content to just bathe in mindless hedonism, which I like to do from time to time, but as a dessert, not a mainstay of life. Everyone can grow. Many societies are much more culturally advanced and civilized than ours and they are, IMO, the ones which have thrown off the yoke of dogmatic primitive cultures and replaced them with rational compassionate modern day thought e.g. most of the Nordic countries, Japan, Iceland, New Zealand, etc. And at the base of all of these societies one will always find pervasive general education. Always. JMO. <<Beautiful and wise baristas, waitresses and sales clerks. You bet they don't make what an engineer makes. You don't need to go to college to become liberally educated- although I grant you, many auto-didacts refuse to read outside their area of interest- which can make them limited boobs, who are under the delusion they are highly educated. But I've met many limited boobs in the liberal arts departments of colleges- so I'm really not a fan. Some of the stupidest people I ever met were teaching me classes in the general ed I had to take. I can't recall any stupid science teachers- but oh boy, I had an absolute cretin for Native American studies (which I had to take as part of the moronic "breadth" requirement). And I met some real dipshits in the English department. My AP class is loads more work than any of the 100 or 200 level classes I took, or that my friends took. Not that I didn't appreciate how ridiculously easy the liberal arts classes were, as I labored in my truly difficult math, chem and bio classes- but learning to think? Maybe, at really top notch universities, with really fine minds. But liberal arts in the Cal State System, or at other lower level colleges- in classes full of mediocre minds, and taught by mediocre teachers? It's highway robbery for the students- and a trip to an impoverished life after college. I can remember 3 decent liberal arts teachers- one in philosophy - but it was an upper division class of medical ethics; one was my upper division comp teacher, who was a ball buster, but very smart, and one history teacher. Most of the learning in the liberal arts classes was wrote learning, or meandering, unfocused intellectually lazy discussions by "professors" who couldn't be bothered to really teach.