Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (803616)	8/25/2014 12:45:27 AM
From: bentway	Respond to of 1582684

Putting Israeli soldiers in Gaza would maintain a steady KIA count. And Israel doesn't seem to have the inclination to accept casualties. I think Hama's whole strategy is to force Israel to send in troops near enough that they can kill a few. The rockets they launch are a joke, even more of one since Iron Dome. What I'm saying is instead of "clear out all Hamas fighters", the only plan that would be a true victory would be "clear out all enemy population". I think they'd like all the Pals gone from Gaza and the WB. But, where the hell would they go? All their neighbors already have big Pal refugee problems.

To: Bilow who wrote (803616)	8/25/2014 3:21:29 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1582684

The only realistic military solution is to push the population out. Preferred solution for sure - but equally impossible at the moment. A DMZ can be quickly created but who would maintain it going forward and how aggressively would they combat violations. Just bombing for another month and then going home will not work either - something new must be tried. Really doubt Egypt would have much heartburn over losing pals/hamas as a neighbor. Has been known to happen... Cheers!